Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Watchdog: Pentagon spent $28M on Afghan uniforms with ill-suited camouflage
UPI ^ | June 21, 2017 | Doug G. Ware

Posted on 06/21/2017 1:40:52 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Continued use of the uniform could cost the Pentagon an extra $72 million in the next 10 years, the report said.

The U.S. Department of Defense may have wasted nearly $30 million over the past decade on uniforms for the Afghan military that featured a forest-style camouflage pattern inappropriate for the country's desert landscapes, a top government fiscal watchdog said Wednesday.

A 17-page report by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction says $28 million has already been spent by the Pentagon on the uniforms -- and perhaps another $72 million will go toward them in the next decade.

According to the analysis, the Pentagon decided in 2007 on a uniform for the Afghan National Army that included a camouflage pattern that presented two problems: First, it included a forest pattern for a Middle Eastern country dominated by deserts -- and second, the U.S. government didn't own the pattern, meaning it had to pay a private company for its use.

The report said that because the Department of Defense opted to use a private pattern, it cost the Pentagon an additional $26 million to $28 million. What's more, it added, is that the department could have used one of the many patterns it already owns that's just as effective -- or ineffective -- as the woodland camouflage pattern.

"Our analysis found that DOD's decision to procure ANA uniforms using a proprietary camouflage pattern was not based on an evaluation of its appropriateness for the Afghan environment," the report states.

"Our analysis found that changing the ANA uniform to a non-proprietary camouflage pattern based on the U.S. Army's Battle Dress Uniform ... could save U.S. taxpayers between $68.61 million and $71.21 million over the next 10 years," it added.

Because the U.S. military continues to use the proprietary design, SIGAR recommended in the report that the Pentagon conduct a cost-benefit analysis to determine whether there is a more cost-effective alternative in outfitting Afghan troops.

SIGAR, a congressionally ordered watchdog group that monitors U.S. financial activities in Afghanistan reconstruction, said it shared the report with the Pentagon and department officials expressed "general agreement" with at least some of its contents.

The Department of Defense did not immediately publicly respond to the SIGAR report Wednesday.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: afghanwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 06/21/2017 1:40:52 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Why not just brown? Off the shelf.

Brown DBUs and floppy hat and a good pair of boots, and go get ‘em boys.


2 posted on 06/21/2017 1:43:54 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Who had interests in the private company? Who made these decisions


3 posted on 06/21/2017 1:44:19 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

What a money pit. Good grief. Maybe Dick Cheney should loan them his expertise and cut spending with an ax in each hand.


4 posted on 06/21/2017 1:44:33 PM PDT by Qwackertoo (Worst 8 years ever, First Affirmative Action President, I hope those who did this to us SUFFER MOST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

oh well. The American taxpayers will just have to be billed (SCREWED) TWICE to cover this tiny little mistake then - eh?


5 posted on 06/21/2017 1:45:45 PM PDT by prophetic (0Bama = 1 illegal president = 32 illegal, unconstitutional & unnecessary CZARS to do his job!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Somewhere in here is a joke about knitting an afghan...


6 posted on 06/21/2017 1:46:02 PM PDT by Made In The USA (Next thing you know, 'ol Jed's a millionaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Hey hey hey! Knock off the complaining. The contractors got paid and returned a percentage to the politicians. Keep in mind what’s important please.


7 posted on 06/21/2017 1:48:06 PM PDT by Seruzawa (FABOL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Really they were wearing Green camo in the frigging desert? What about the camo they wore in Iraq? That wasn’t good enough? Desert Sand digital camo should have the first and only option!


8 posted on 06/21/2017 1:54:07 PM PDT by Blue Highway (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I propose tactical burkas to really blend in with the locals.


9 posted on 06/21/2017 1:54:09 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: prophetic

Every gov’t entity is run like the DMV


10 posted on 06/21/2017 1:55:21 PM PDT by vooch (America First)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I wonder how much the USAF wasted on the Airman Battle Uniform (ABU).

It is ill-fitting, too thick and hot, and provides limited camouflage.


11 posted on 06/21/2017 1:55:50 PM PDT by Mr.Unique (The government, by its very nature, cannot give except what it first takes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Wait so this design was made for US service men in Afghanistan or for the Afghanis? If it is for them, WTF are we paying for their uniforms AT ALL? Is this real life?


12 posted on 06/21/2017 1:58:39 PM PDT by Blue Highway (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Unique

What about the Navy’s BLUE camouflage? You fall overboard, how are they going to find you?


13 posted on 06/21/2017 2:00:20 PM PDT by beelzepug (Anybody I attack may rest assured it's personal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

And this is the government wants to control every aspect of your life because they are so much smarter than you.


14 posted on 06/21/2017 2:00:44 PM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

So we’ve been there something like 16 years now and still haven’t figured out what uniforms to wear? Don’t buy it.

This is someone out to make $$$ at taxpayer expense. Ridiculous


15 posted on 06/21/2017 2:01:45 PM PDT by The Numbers (God, Family and Country is Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prophetic

How real is/was the sequester crises ?


16 posted on 06/21/2017 2:02:50 PM PDT by aumrl (let's keep it real Conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

It’s not the design/pattern, it’s the COLORS! GREEN?

Camouflage is about breaking up the image. The pattern in and of itself is way less important than the colors.

Why didn’t they just make them red? That way they could blend in with the ground after they were shot.


17 posted on 06/21/2017 2:08:28 PM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Maybe they are being posted at oases. (plural of oasis, I looked it up)


18 posted on 06/21/2017 2:12:51 PM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Drain the military swamp.


19 posted on 06/21/2017 2:13:35 PM PDT by cp124 (Democrats & MSM: Make America Hate Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qwackertoo

Cheney was VP when it started this started, why didn’t he stop it then?


20 posted on 06/21/2017 2:15:40 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson