Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI Claims Attempted GOP Assassinations Are ‘Assault’ — NOT Terrorism
Daily Caller ^ | June 21, 2017 | Peter Hasson

Posted on 06/21/2017 10:36:52 AM PDT by libstripper

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: libstripper

Just a series of “lone wolf” attacks, or of pairs of lone wolves, or small pack of lone wolves. Also, copy cat attacks. Nothing to connect the dots. Just like Black Lives Matter and radical Islam.


21 posted on 06/21/2017 10:51:21 AM PDT by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Wow the FBI are big liars for political reasons, whaddaya know.


22 posted on 06/21/2017 10:52:08 AM PDT by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grania
I wonder if authorities are investigating if anyone higher up the Dem food chain had communication with the assassin. (words matter)

Just spitballin' here, but maybe like Robert Creamer?

23 posted on 06/21/2017 10:52:15 AM PDT by Roccus (When you talk to a politician...ANY politician...always say, "Remember Ceausescu")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Redmen4ever

Fully Bogus Information


24 posted on 06/21/2017 10:52:25 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kabar

That’s an interesting definition. I’ve always thought of terrorism being defined because of its randomness. Last Wednesday, Republican HOR members were specific targets. That’s assassination.


25 posted on 06/21/2017 10:52:31 AM PDT by grania (Deplorable and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

The FBI has long-defined terrorism as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.
___
The act carried out by James T. Hodgkinson fits the FBI’s terrorism definition to a tee. The MSM, disgruntled democrats, GOPes, the deep state and others have been waging a terrorist-inciting campaign since Trump was elected.


26 posted on 06/21/2017 10:54:43 AM PDT by lakecumberlandvet (Appeasement never works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Then Timothy McVeigh was not an act of terrorism. Neither was the Giffords shooting.

The FBI has to keep the terrorist acts down as low as possible so they look like they’re protecting you. Therefore, work place violence doesn’t count.


27 posted on 06/21/2017 10:54:58 AM PDT by Terry Mross (Liver spots And blood thinners.,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

The FBI has been EU’d.


28 posted on 06/21/2017 10:57:33 AM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

I see it as an act of war


29 posted on 06/21/2017 10:57:34 AM PDT by al baby (May the Forceps be with you Hi Mom Its a Joke friends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

The FIB is corrupt-af.


30 posted on 06/21/2017 10:57:39 AM PDT by a fool in paradise ( Mr. Comey, did you engage in or know of ANY OTHER leaks?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing
Calling this attack an 'assault' is fine, or even better "assassination attempt". But to call it 'terrorism' would be to confuse it with the term we often use when Muslims or ISIS are the perpetrators.

Sorry, but this is a case of terrorism as defined by the FBI and federal code. The murderer was trying to intimidate a political party and its elected representatives in the furtherance of political objectives.

We have a history of domestic terrorism like the Black Liberation Army, the Weathermen, Ayran Nations, Animal Liberation Front, etc.

"Terrorism is defined in the Code of Federal Regulations as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives” (28 C.F.R. Section 0.85)

31 posted on 06/21/2017 10:57:58 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Terrorism is a practice, not a belief system, and the FBI properly defines it as, “the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.”, as noted at post no. 14. Thus, it can be Islamic, communist, Nazi, KKK, or by anyone else who engages in the defined actions. By that definition this was a direct, deliberate act of terrorism. The FBI is willfully violating its own rules to cover for the DemonCrap party, just as Obola did in the case of Nadal Hassan, the Fort Hood Islamic terrorist.


32 posted on 06/21/2017 10:59:04 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Souled_Out

What did the DNC know and when did they know it?


33 posted on 06/21/2017 11:01:15 AM PDT by a fool in paradise ( Mr. Comey, did you engage in or know of ANY OTHER leaks?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: grania
That’s an interesting definition. I’ve always thought of terrorism being defined because of its randomness.

Sorry, but randomness is not necessary to be an act of terrorism. It can be a directed attack against a specific target or targets. In this case it appears it was directed against the GOP members of Congress. Trump was also mentioned by him as a traitor who needed to be destroyed along with his supporters.

Last Wednesday, Republican HOR members were specific targets. That’s assassination.

Assassination and terrorism are not mutually exclusive.

34 posted on 06/21/2017 11:02:00 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

It’s only terrorism if you’re the one who gets shot or killed.


35 posted on 06/21/2017 11:03:24 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The Swamp Strikes Back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

It’s only assassination if liberals and their protected classes are the target. People who are white, male, heterosexual, and/or conservative are fair game, at least according to the FBI and federal government.

Got that? Good.

Now you know what you’re up against.


36 posted on 06/21/2017 11:07:06 AM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it. MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
I agree with many commenters that this was not terrorism. Terrorism requires using a political motive in targeting civilians to spread fear.

Generating fear was not Hodgkinson's goal. He targeted Republican Congressmen to eliminate those he saw as political opponents. This was an attempted political assassination x20.

37 posted on 06/21/2017 11:12:15 AM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

“We also assess that there was no nexus to terrorism.”
FBI Assistant Director in Charge Andrew Vale must be burnishing his resume to send to Mueller.


38 posted on 06/21/2017 11:16:32 AM PDT by BilLies (Judge Excoriates Two Hearst Executives http://yale64.org/news/white.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Explain the difference to those who have suffered. What a crock of BS.


39 posted on 06/21/2017 11:40:57 AM PDT by mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two
"Terrorism is defined in the Code of Federal Regulations as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives” (28 C.F.R. Section 0.85)

Was Hodgkinson trying to intimidate or coerce a government in furtherance of political objectives? Don't you think killing GOP elected representatives is an attack on government? Of course this is terrorism pure and simple.

Here is another example:

The United States Capitol shooting incident of 1954 was an attack on March 1, 1954, by four Puerto Rican nationalists; they shot 30 rounds from semi-automatic pistols from the Ladies' Gallery (a balcony for visitors) of the House of Representatives chamber in the United States Capitol. They wanted to highlight their desire for Puerto Rican independence from US rule.

Celerbrations and outrage as Puerto Rican terrorist goes free

“It’s really sickening,” said former NYPD Detective Anthony “Tony” Senft, 70, who lost an eye while trying to defuse a bomb planted by FALN — or Armed Forces of National Liberation — at the Brooklyn federal courthouse in 1982.

“They’re making him a folk hero, and he’s a terrorist. They’re making this guy like Robin Hood.”

40 posted on 06/21/2017 11:43:12 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson