Posted on 06/20/2017 10:16:57 AM PDT by drewh
Trump for Obstruction, drewh wrote:
this is not a road the rats wants to do down, as another poster stated why not expand the Lynch investigation into everything that was done under O and Clinton regarding emails, Benghazi gunnruning and fast /furious
The GOP and Trump admin have shown no interest in investigating Obama/Hillary.
so what is Grassley horsetrading here for? you know Lynch is gonna stonewall about the Bubba tarmac meeting under ‘national security’ rules...that’s why its a kabuki theatre show triil-they get to batter sessions around and we get Lynch on the stand
Health Care Tax Reform Dodd Frank nothing but every Senator can have a weekly Reality Show and fire up the Nuts so someone else can be shot
The framers implicitly immunized a sitting president from ordinary criminal prosecution, Akhil Reed Amar, a law professor at Yale recently commented. If youre going to undo a national election, the body that does that should have a national mandate, he continued. DOJ Website
I thought Feinstein was going to investigate LYNCH ... what the hell is this and why is Grassley agreeing to it?
right, the rats have NO leverage at all...Grassley is gonna retire anyway he’s so old around 90 at the next election
The constitution does not give Congress the power to investigate the President. Trump should refuse to cooperate in any way.
Both sides in congress are worthless sots.
This is starting to piss me off. Why are they wasting our taxdollars “probing” a nothingburger? On what proof or evidence is this probe based? Where’s the beef?
They should know that you can’t charge a standing President
with obstruction, or anything else.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.