Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

This is a false understanding of the law. The US Constitution does itself refer to “Our Lord” in it’s ending statement.


11 posted on 06/20/2017 6:52:36 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
There is no false understanding. They know full well our founding fathers would approve of such crosses on public property, but Satan's minions also know conservatives are too weak and lazy to do anything about it. That's just the way we are.

If a godless, demonic supreme court would legalize the murder of our unborn without conservatives "storming the Bastille", then we're sure not going to do anything about this.

Pseudo Christians do Christ's cause more harm than anything.

57 posted on 06/20/2017 8:11:20 AM PDT by LouAvul (The most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp
done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth In witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names,
77 posted on 06/20/2017 10:35:50 AM PDT by yuleeyahoo (Those are my principles, and if you do not like them...well I have others. - Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson