To: Kaslin
This is a false understanding of the law. The US Constitution does itself refer to “Our Lord” in it’s ending statement.
11 posted on
06/20/2017 6:52:36 AM PDT by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: DiogenesLamp
There is no false understanding. They know full well our founding fathers would approve of such crosses on public property, but Satan's minions also know conservatives are too weak and lazy to do anything about it. That's just the way we are.
If a godless, demonic supreme court would legalize the murder of our unborn without conservatives "storming the Bastille", then we're sure not going to do anything about this.
Pseudo Christians do Christ's cause more harm than anything.
57 posted on
06/20/2017 8:11:20 AM PDT by
LouAvul
(The most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will.)
To: DiogenesLamp
done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth In witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names,
77 posted on
06/20/2017 10:35:50 AM PDT by
yuleeyahoo
(Those are my principles, and if you do not like them...well I have others. - Groucho Marx)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson