Personal details of nearly 200 million US citizens exposed

BBC ^ | 6.19.17

[ItsOnlyDaryl]

Sensitive personal details relating to almost 200 million US citizens have been accidentally exposed by a marketing firm contracted by the Republican National Committee. The 1.1 terabytes of data includes birthdates, home addresses, telephone numbers and political views of nearly 62% of the entire US population. The data was available on a publicly accessible Amazon cloud server. Anyone could access the data as long as they had a link to it.

[Manly Warrior]

so what’s the link????

[Hostage]

This story has a fishy smell as there is an investigation into the NADRA breach and related to the Molly McCaulsky murder.

Sound like someone is trying to make the RNC the fall guy.

[ItsOnlyDaryl]

Does the link not show up for you? It’s working on my end.

[Pearls Before Swine]

Well, if it’s any consolation, this data can’t be used for commercial or political persuasion, because the subjects have passed.

Then again, with the Dems so set against voting security, maybe these souls can rise and vote again. /S

And, why would the RNC have a monopoly on this sort of data?

[Old Yeller]

Subtract the illegals and that’s about everyone.

[deport]

click the read more link at the end of the excerpt.
Or does it no show up for you?

[ransomnote]

So I guess the libs will have more people to target and by that I mean, drive them out of their businesses or jobs with boycotts for being in possession of “wrong thoughts.”

[9YearLurker]

Huh?

The RNC has for years given over its major data contracts to hacks like these guys. The co-founder of this firm also did the data for Jeb 16.

Business as usual, such stupidity from them does not surprise me. Could it have been done because someone was paid off to make that information available?

Sure it is an overwhelmingly corrupt crowd too. But in this case, I suspect the simplest explanation fits—it’s just the Stupid Party at work.

[\/\/ayne]

“Deep Root Analytics” made the mistake according to the article.

[gnarledmaw]

Not the BBC, to the database.

[gnarledmaw]

That was my thought too. So which one of us downloaded it and how much for my copy with the goodguy dicscount?

[catnipman]

other articles say that the discover notified amazon, which notified the owners, and that they closed the access before anything got out.

[Yosemitest]

B.S. !
The REAL GUILTY PARTY IS THE DemocRATS !

The Democratic National Committee REFUSED to allow their computers and servers to be searched for evidence.
WHY ?
I propose that

the Democratic National Committee hired Amid Awan, Jamal Awan, Imran Awan, and Rao Abbas to do the hacking to search for evidence against their opponents in the 2016 election,
and also had them hack the Democratic National Committee's own computers and servers, so as to remove suspicion from the DemocRATS.

Consider the following information about the SO CALLED Russian Hacking.
I believe it was the Democratic National Committee who was DOING the hacking and leaving FALSE TRACES of the Russians.
We MUST INVESTIGATE the Democratic National Committee's servers ! ! !

Let's review a few pieces of history, such as:

CBS NEWS on December 12, 2016, John Bolton says claims of Russian hacking could be "false flag" operation

MotherBoard.Vice.com on Oct 12 2016, How Hackers Plant False Flags to Hide Their Real Identities

Politico on Dec 11 2016 Bolton: Russian hacks could actually have been by Obama administration

National Review on Nov 1 2016 The Clinton E-mails Are Critical to the Clinton Foundation Investigation

The Rush Limbaugh Show on Jun 13, 2017 We Have Evidence That Loretta Lynch Obstructed Justice

NewsMax on May 31 2017 Debbie Wasserman Schultz Admits She Violated Information Security Policy 'For Years'

Politico on Mar 1 2017 House Democrats fire two IT staffers amid criminal investigation

The Daily Caller on Mar 4 2017 EXCLUSIVE: House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs Committee Members Compromised By Rogue IT Staff

Now based on the articles linked above, I propose to you that it is VERY POSSIBLE AND CREDIBLE

that the Democratic National Committee,
under the direction of Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Hillary and Bill Clinton, and the ILLEGAL ALIEN IN CHIEF,
hired Amid Awan, Jamal Awan, Imran Awan, and Rao Abbas
to hack those computers,
and to place false flags to make it look as if the Russians did the hacking.

On the other side of the issue is:

The Glenn Beck Program on Jun 13, 2017 EXCLUSIVE: Jim DeMint Weighs in on Russia and His New Role at Convention of States

Bloomberg.Com on June 13, 2017 Russian Cyber Hacks on U.S. Electoral System Far Wider Than Previously Known

Schneier on Security on Jun 9 2017 NSA Document Outlining Russian Attempts to Hack Voter Rolls

TheIntercept.Com on June 5 2017


TOP-SECRET NSA REPORT DETAILS RUSSIAN HACKING EFFORT DAYS BEFORE 2016 ELECTION

Now, I trust former Senator Jim DeMint, and I trust Rush and Glenn.
But all former Senator Jim DeMint has is the document he was shown and briefed upon, and they came from a corrupted agency under Obama and his minions.

In closing, let me make it clear that

I strongly believe that document and other sources were generated by Amid Awan, Jamal Awan, Imran Awan, and Rao Abbas,
while they were working for he Democratic National Committee, under the direction of Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Hillary and Bill Clinton, and the ILLEGAL ALIEN IN CHIEF .


Imran Awan, target of a House security probe, worked in IT for Rep. Andre Carson, a member of the intelligence committee


Former President Bill Clinton with alleged Muslim Spy Imran Awan


Wasserman Schultz Threatened Police Chief For Gathering Evidence On Her IT Staffer’s Alleged Crimes


THE AWAN BROTHERS PAKISTANI/AMERICAN INTERNET SECURITY TEAM


Obama Placed ISLAMIC SPIES in the Federal Government. Details Are Treason.

[piasa]

Sensitive personal details relating to almost 200 million US citizens have been accidentally exposed by a marketing firm contracted by the Republican National Committee.

Sounds like the author's playing word games Unless the marketing firm has but one client, then this sentence would be just as valid for any of their clients:

Sensitive personal details relating to almost 200 million US citizens have been accidentally exposed by a marketing firm contracted by insert any client here.