I’m not sure what to say at this point, but I was watching Fox News coverage of the ‘incident’ in London earlier and the guest on the phone, Ric Grenell, spoke of monitoring ‘all radical conversations’.
Grenell, who has worked in the highest levels of the US government, considered for NATO Ambassador by President Trump, says we need to monitor ‘all radical conversations’.
I take that to mean that anyone who wants to ‘fight back’ in the face of terrorism would be considered ‘radical’ by the highest levels of our own government.
The priority for Americans must be looking out for the USA it would seem to me and I elected Donald Trump to do that and I hope he does when it comes to our security from terrorism.
I don’t want to see Americans angered by terrorist attacks to be labeled as ‘radical’ and monitored by the government.
“I don’t want to see Americans angered by terrorist attacks to be labeled as ‘radical’ and monitored by the government.”
From the 1950s forward, TV westerns used to present regular plots that stressed the absolute evil that was vigilantism.
Nothing could be worse.
I grew up believing it.
Now we see our government cashing in on that, spending time and treasure trying to identify people who might stop terrorists, when they would be better occupied identifying terrorists.