With all due respect to Ms Coulter and Sarah Palin, Coulter supported Romney while Palin supported McCain. So the planet question is reasonably politically applicable imo.
Regarding Trump’s wall, Pres. Trump is still promising the wall so it is coming imo.
Noting that I gladly voted for Trump and do not regret doing so, the real problem the wall is that some of Trump’s campaign promises were shortsighted for the following reason.
Evidently neither Trump, or his supporters, understood that the Oval Office is constitutionally “married” to Congress. And while patriots cleaned up the Oval Office in the last election, they haven’t cleaned up Congress.
So Trump’s first two years in office are basically practice imo, the RINO-controlled, anti-Trump Congress seemingly trying to block Trump’s every move.
On the other hand, Trump’s negotiating skills have been shining through, and probably more than we think, regardless of “doubting Thomases” like Coulter.
The bottom line is that patriots need to follow through with cleaning up Congress, as they did with the Oval Office in 2016, patriots hopefully electing as much of a Trump-supporting Congress as they can in the 2018 elections.
Regarding the wall, I surmise that part of the delay with the wall is that the federal fiscal year for ’16 - ’17 had already started when Trump won the election, the fiscal year not ending until Sept. 30, 2017.
2017 United States federal budget
So the wall has evidently been delayed because it wasn’t in the budget, corrections, insights welcome. (I wouldn’t be surprised if the corrupt feds have billions hidden in nooks and crannies that could be used for the wall. But they’re probably not going to let Trump know about it if so.)
Drain the swamp! Drain the swamp!
Remember in November ’18 !
Since Trump entered the ’16 presidential race too late for patriots to make sure that there were state sovereignty-respecting candidates on the primary ballots, patriots need make sure that such candidates are on the ’18 primary ballots so that they can be elected to support Trump in draining the unconstitutionally big federal government swamp.
Such a Congress will also be able to finish draining the swamp with respect to getting the remaining state sovereignty-ignoring, activist Supreme Court justices off of the bench.
In fact, if Justice Gorsuch turns out to be a liberal Trojan Horse then we will need 67 patriot senators to remove a House-impeached Gorsuch from office.
Noting that the primaries start in Iowa and New Hampshire in February ‘18, patriots need to challenge candidates for federal office in the following way.
While I Googled the primary information above concerning Iowa and New Hampshire, FReeper iowamark brought to my attention that the February primaries for these states apply only to presidential election years. And after doing some more scratching, since primary dates for most states for 2018 elections probably haven’t been uploaded at this time (March 14, 2017), FReepers will need to find out primary dates from sources and / or websites in their own states.
Patriots need to qualify candidates by asking them why the Founding States made the Constitution’s Section 8 of Article I; to limit (cripple) the federal government’s powers.
Patriots also need to find candidates that are knowledgeable of the Supreme Court's clarifications of the federal government’s limited powers listed below.
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphasis added].” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Coulter is not a doubting Thomas she is just pointing out the obvious truth. He promised to end DACA on day one because it was unconstitutional and illegal, apparently since he has taken office it is no longer illegal. No doubting there, that is what he did.
In doubting Thomas's day, profits that predicted the future that didn't come to pass were thrown off a cliff.