FOLLOW THE MONEY
Posted on 06/15/2017 11:38:05 AM PDT by ForYourChildren
There are good (and large) estimates for how many people die every year because they don’t have energy for refrigeration, communications, transportation, etc. These estimates are much better science than future temperature estimates (the number of deaths matches observation unlike temperature models)
A lot of this money will go to leaders/dictators/presidents to ensure that millions of people who can be scientifically observed/counted/estimated reliably do not get access to life-saving energy because of temperatures projections which cannot be observed/counted/estimated reliably. But Al Gore isn’t about to take even minor chances with his beachfront property no matter how many people it kills (besides, carbon trading could make Gore billions so screw everyone else).
Wealth Re-distribution at the wholesale level
Look into the wind/solar power racket.
Son of a friend of mine, fresh out of college and a con man since he was born, got hooked up with the big wind farms south of Spokane.
B.S.'d his way though one position and another, found himself as VP of the whole project.
My friend sent me a text one day, this was six or eight years ago, saying "My son just made his first million, at age 27."
Thank God President Trump got us out of that boondoggle.
That’s almost $2k for each person on earth. For the Ctrl-Left to pretend the alleged one degree temperature difference, even if true, is worth that much money is insane. Of course, most things from the far left fringe are crazy, so this is not a surprise.
Misguided state lawmakers foolishly gave up the voices of the state legislatures in Congress when they ratified that amendment, effectively repealing the whole Constitution by doing so imo.
Here is a list of MAJOR constitutional problems with USA funding of things like Paris climate accord as clarified by Thomas Jefferson and previous generations of state sovereignty-respecting Supreme Court justices.
“In giving to the President and Senate a power to make treaties, the Constitution meant only to authorize them to carry into effect, by way of treaty, any powers they might constitutionally exercise.” —Thomas Jefferson: The Anas, 1793.
"In every event, I would rather construe so narrowly as to oblige the nation to amend, and thus declare what powers they would agree to yield, than too broadly, and indeed, so broadly as to enable the executive and the Senate to do things which the Constitution forbids." --Thomas Jefferson: The Anas, 1793.
“Surely the President and Senate cannot do by treaty what the whole government is interdicted from doing in any way.” — Thomas Jefferson: Parliamentary Manual, 1812 .
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”If the tax be not proposed for the common defence, or general welfare, but for other objects, wholly extraneous, (as for instance, for propagating Mahometanism among the Turks, or giving aids and subsidies to a foreign nation, to build palaces for its kings, or erect monuments to its heroes,) it would be wholly indefensible upon constitutional principles [emphases added].” —Justice Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution 2
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
“2. Insofar as Art. 2(11) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice provides for the military trial of civilian dependents accompanying the armed forces in foreign countries, it cannot be sustained as legislation which is "necessary and proper" to carry out obligations of the United States under international agreements made with those countries, since no agreement with a foreign nation can confer on Congress or any other branch of the Government power which is free from the restraints of the Constitution [emphasis added] .” — Reid v. Covert, 1956.
Drain the swamp! Drain the swamp!
Remember in November ’18 !
Since Trump entered the ’16 presidential race too late for patriots to make sure that there were state sovereignty-respecting candidates on the primary ballots, patriots need make sure that such candidates are on the ’18 primary ballots so that they can be elected to support Trump in draining the unconstitutionally big federal government swamp.
Such a Congress will also be able to finish draining the swamp with respect to getting the remaining state sovereignty-ignoring, activist Supreme Court justices off of the bench.
In fact, if Justice Gorsuch turns out to be a liberal Trojan Horse then we will need 67 patriot senators to remove a House-impeached Gorsuch from office.
Noting that the primaries start in Iowa and New Hampshire in February ‘18, patriots need to challenge candidates for federal office in the following way.
While I Googled the primary information above concerning Iowa and New Hampshire, FReeper iowamark brought to my attention that the February primaries for these states apply only to presidential election years. And after doing some more scratching, since primary dates for most states for 2018 elections probably haven’t been uploaded at this time (March 14, 2017), FReepers will need to find out primary dates from sources and / or websites in their own states.
Patriots need to qualify candidates by asking them why the Founding States made the Constitution’s Section 8 of Article I; to limit (cripple) the federal government’s powers.
Patriots also need to find candidates that are knowledgeable of the Supreme Court's clarifications of the federal government’s limited powers listed above.
FOLLOW THE MONEY
.
Excellent post!
.
>BNEF says a “further $5.3 trillion investment in 3.9 [terawatts] of zero-carbon capacity would be consistent with keeping the planet on a 2-degrees-C trajectory,
about 1.74 x 10e17 watts strikes the earth. (ie: 174,000,000,000,000,000, or 174 quadrillion watts). If there are no clouds in the way, then one square meter of the earth will receive about one kilowatt of that energy.
So grab a meter of that for each sucker and blow the sunshine up their butts.
Sim Ting Wong here. Sum Buddy Gettin Rich.
Yeah. If this were a crowdfunder, what would each man, woman, child (and other) get for their $2k donation?? I might pony up if they give me Maximum 78 degree F summers.
“$12.7 trillion to keep projected global warming below 2 degrees Celsius”
Heck, give me the spreadsheet a 20 minutes and I will get the ‘projected’ temp down 2 degrees for only 8 trillion. In cash.
Tell me it’s really not about the money....that it’s for the children...
What do we get for 12.7 trillion? Several hundredths of a degree reduced temperature. In other words, NOTHING! Trump was right to cancel this idiotic deal.
There are few greater folly’s than demanding the climate be static.
Sorry...all the now unemployed Obamacare Navigators are re-assigned as Carbon Credit Facilitators..starting at $48 an hour....
Me,me, oh let it be me, it’s my turn
Inform Blomberg his bill has arrived, minimum payment due 12.7
If they want it, be my guest, they can send as much as they want
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
