Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Baltimore prosecutor says she’s immune from officers’ suit
Washington Post ^ | June 15, 2017

Posted on 06/15/2017 9:42:03 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

Baltimore’s top prosecutor is urging a federal appeals court to find that she is immune from a civil lawsuit filed by five police officers charged in the death of Freddie Gray.

The officers are suing Baltimore State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby for malicious prosecution, defamation and invasion of privacy. Other claims, including false imprisonment, were dismissed.

Mosby said in a brief filed this week in the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that a lower court should have found her to be immune from being sued because she’s a prosecutor.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: baltimore; blm; bluelivesmatter; riots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 06/15/2017 9:42:03 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Well, maybe they can find her to be “immune from being Black” too while they are at it.


2 posted on 06/15/2017 9:44:17 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Radical left wing activist politicians are usually immune to any sort of legal action, according to radical left wing activist judges.


3 posted on 06/15/2017 9:45:59 AM PDT by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imbler_v._Pachtman

For the 1st time, possibly in her life, she’s correct.

Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976), was a United States Supreme Court case in which district attorneys or prosecutors were found to have full immunity from civil suits resulting from their government duties.

Imbler, a defendant in a murder trial, had been convicted and sentenced when the district attorney, Pachtman, revealed new evidence that he said had recently surfaced and which exonerated Imbler. Imbler used the new evidence to successfully free himself, then brought up a civil suit alleging that Pachtman had withheld evidence. The suit, however, was dismissed on the grounds that Pachtman had prosecutorial immunity, a finding which the Supreme Court affirmed.


4 posted on 06/15/2017 9:47:05 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

They always think they should be immune to the damage they do.


5 posted on 06/15/2017 9:47:12 AM PDT by ColdOne ((I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Best Election Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

GOOD!


6 posted on 06/15/2017 9:49:06 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Ask Mike Nifong how that works...


7 posted on 06/15/2017 9:50:43 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Black privileges


8 posted on 06/15/2017 9:51:31 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Thanks so much for your support to this point... I personally apprecaite it...
FReepers, it's time to wrap up this FReep-a-thon.  Lets do it...


President Donald J. Trump and the Free Republic of the United States of America

Ramirez political cartoon: United and Undaunted LARGE VERSION
06/15/2017: LINK  LINK to regular sized versions of his political cartoons (archive).


Please join the monthlies, an automated and the best way to help support Free Republic.  If you opt not to join the automated monthly support program, please consider joining the One One Done project.  LINK



FReepers, 98.48% of the Second Quarter FReep-a-thon goal has been met.  Click above and pencil in your donation now.  Please folks, lets end this FReepathon.  Thank you!

...this is a general all-purpose message, and should not be seen as targeting any individual I am responding to...

Just $455.00 dollars to 99.00%

9 posted on 06/15/2017 9:52:13 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Fourth estate? Ha! Our media has become the KCOTUS, the Kangaroo Court of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

So the prosecutor wants her actions to be accountable to no one. She then answers to no one.

That’s called a dictator.


10 posted on 06/15/2017 9:55:15 AM PDT by Flick Lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

All dictators are immune from legal reprisal for their illegal actions until their victims have had enough of their thuggery and take matters into their own hands. History repeats.


11 posted on 06/15/2017 9:59:41 AM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

She is elected. She is accountable to the voter.


12 posted on 06/15/2017 10:00:31 AM PDT by NotQuiteCricket (DidnÂ’t think wet works meant pool parties at the Vineyard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Nifong had a criminal conviction working against him. I’m sure his “prosecutorial immunity” was effectively surrendered in that case.


13 posted on 06/15/2017 10:01:55 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

She then answers to no one.

*************

Its the Liberal Way.


14 posted on 06/15/2017 10:02:36 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Ask Mike Nifong how that works...

Nifong served one day in jail for contempt of court.

North Carolina state law is a different matter from Federal law.

15 posted on 06/15/2017 10:03:57 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

She is immune Because:
It’s Baltimore
She’s Black
She’s female


16 posted on 06/15/2017 10:04:13 AM PDT by bert (K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vette6387
She wouldn't be immune if she was white.

She needs to check her black privilege

17 posted on 06/15/2017 10:12:41 AM PDT by atc23 (The Confederacy was the single greatest conservative resistance to federal authority ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound
I haven't studied the Mosley case, but the absolute immunity covers her prosecutorial function; and I think there are even carve outs there.

You bring up a good cite, it may have been brought up at the trial court on motion to dismiss. Somewhere down in the weeds there is a more precise angle at work, than "I am a proscutor, I am immune."

18 posted on 06/15/2017 10:17:56 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: atc23
Always remember, maryland is THE Freak state. It is hopeless there. Leave while you can.
19 posted on 06/15/2017 10:19:42 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: atc23

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-4th-circuit/1617846.html

On December 17, 2012, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected all of the players’ federal claims in Evans v Chalmers Case No. 11-1436 (C.A. 4), holding: “To recapitulate, we hold as follows. We reverse the district court’s denial of all defendants’ motions to dismiss the federal claims alleged against them.

We reverse the court’s denial of the City’s motion for summary judgment as to the state common-law claims alleged against it. We affirm the court’s denial of Officers Gottlieb and Himan’s motions to dismiss the state common-law malicious prosecution claims alleged against them.

We reverse the court’s denial of the officers’ motions to dismiss all other state common-law claims. We dismiss for lack of appellate jurisdiction the City’s appeal of the state constitutional claims alleged against it. Finally, we remand the cases for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

The only claims to survive this decision were state constitutional claims. Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III concurred, ruling: “A few additional observations may underscore the overblown nature of this case. Plaintiffs have sought to raise every experimental claim and to corral every conceivable defendant.

The result is a case on the far limbs of law and one destined, were it to succeed in whole, to spread damage in all directions.

Yes, it was upheld by the US Supreme Court. No, Nifong wasn’t black.


20 posted on 06/15/2017 10:20:57 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson