Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Proof That Comey Lied Under Oath At His Senate Hearing!
Hidden Americans ^ | 06/08/2017 | Richard Saunders

Posted on 06/08/2017 2:31:11 PM PDT by nodwam

Reddit subscriber /u/AintGotNoTimeFoThis on The_Donald shows proof that Comey was lying about the reason he leaked his Trump memos.

Comey lied and said Trump’s tweets caused him to leak to NYT through a Columbia law professor, but the Tweets came after the leaks

Comey memo leaked to the New York Times on May 11 at the latest.

Trump Tweets about tapes – May 12.

Comey says that Trump’s tweet about tapes caused him to leak memos to Times –

Mr. Comey said he decided to make the conversation public through an intermediary after Mr. Trump said on Twitter that the former F.B.I. director had better hope there were no tapes of their discussions. He said he did so with the explicit hope of triggering the appointment of a special counsel to investigate Russian election interference.

“I woke up in the middle of the night on Monday night, ‘cause it didn’t dawn on me originally that there might be corroboration for our conversation; there might be a tape,” Mr. Comey said, referring to May 15. “And my judgment was I needed to get that out in the public square so I asked a friend of mine to share the content of the memo with a reporter. Didn’t do it myself for a variety of reasons but I asked him to because I thought that might prompt the appointment of a special counsel. So I asked a close friend of mine to do it.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/08/us/politics/james-comey-testimony-hearing.html

Comey just Outed himself lying

To people wondering whether the May 11 NYT story was based on the actual memos: this is from that article – 3 days before the tweets:

By Mr. Comey’s account, his answer to Mr. Trump’s initial question apparently did not satisfy the president, the associates said. Later in the dinner, Mr. Trump again said to Mr. Comey that he needed his loyalty. Mr. Comey again replied that he would give him “honesty” and did not pledge his loyalty, according to the account of the conversation. But Mr. Trump pressed him on whether it would be “honest loyalty.” “You will have that,” Mr. Comey told his associates he responded.

Comey has shown himself to be completely full of crap and he clearly committed perjury. And it cannot be accidental perjury where he simply misspoke as the lie was the entire basis for the reason that he provided for his leaks.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 115th; comey; comeyhearings; demlies; leaks; loyalty; memo; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 06/08/2017 2:31:11 PM PDT by nodwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nodwam

caught lying under oath. That pretty much makes the rest of his testimony unreliable as well as any future testimony he might make.


2 posted on 06/08/2017 2:33:26 PM PDT by RC one (The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nodwam

CORRUPT COMEY LYING???? I am SHOCKED!!..../s


3 posted on 06/08/2017 2:35:29 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nodwam

Lock him up!


4 posted on 06/08/2017 2:37:05 PM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nodwam

““I woke up in the middle of the night on Monday night”

Trump is inside the head’s of the entire Obama/Clinton cartel.


5 posted on 06/08/2017 2:37:32 PM PDT by Rebelbase (Hack-proof tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nodwam

Be very careful with this story. The reports I have seen state that the first NYT story was on May 16. If so, this article is incorrect and should not be repeated.

Or maybe we have a coverup underway. Hopefully someone will clarify.


6 posted on 06/08/2017 2:40:41 PM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. About time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nodwam

Comey is a slime scuz. Former money laundering king for drug cartels.


7 posted on 06/08/2017 2:43:44 PM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/11/us/politics/trump-comey-showboat-fbi.html?_r=0


8 posted on 06/08/2017 2:47:29 PM PDT by rfp1234 (DinosorosExtinction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nodwam

Bookmark


9 posted on 06/08/2017 2:48:47 PM PDT by DocRock (And now is the time to fight! Peter Muhlenberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
The May 11 story is on the subject of "loyalty"

The May 16 story is on the subject of "drop the Flynn investigation."

The "he better hope there are no tapes" tweet was May 12.

Comey has more than one memo, but clearly he leaked before the tapes tweet came out. Maybe Comey leaked more than once. Maybe his leaks are themselves full of BS. He said himself there was nobody to corroborate his version.

10 posted on 06/08/2017 2:51:38 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Much thanks for that clarification. Methinks we are are seeing a bit of muddy water via the MSM.


11 posted on 06/08/2017 2:56:21 PM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. About time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
-- Methinks we are are seeing a bit of muddy water via the MSM. --

Situation normal. Most dishonest people on the planet.

12 posted on 06/08/2017 2:58:03 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nodwam

Where is May 11 story. I found one on the 15th.


13 posted on 06/08/2017 2:59:14 PM PDT by doug from upland (Hey, traitor Democrats. I have a tree. I'm sure another FReeper has a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt; kiltie65

Yup. Loretta Lynch decided the Clinton emails investigation was to be labeled a “matter” thus avoiding any subpoenas/arrests, etc. Good to hear that, and now get Loretta Lunch in front of Congress to testify on her transgressions.


Did you know this, C, that the terms actually are not for media consumption but actually are procedurally different?


14 posted on 06/08/2017 2:59:20 PM PDT by txhurl (Time to blow the Queen and King off the board, DJT, and by your birthday, or on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RC one

This was all in the letter from Trumps lawyer.


15 posted on 06/08/2017 2:59:22 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RC one

This was all in the letter from Trumps lawyer.


16 posted on 06/08/2017 3:00:11 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RC one

This was all in the letter from Trumps lawyer.


17 posted on 06/08/2017 3:02:17 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

5/11
https://goo.gl/photos/RoYSy7ULBtjBAtXc6


18 posted on 06/08/2017 3:03:05 PM PDT by combat_boots (God bless Israel and all who protect and defend her! And please, God, bless the USA again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: txhurl
The word "investigation" has procedural significance. In a crime context, it means there is or was articulable suspicion a crime may have been committed. Short of that, no criminal investigation is warranted.

The word "matter" has ZERO legal significance, other than it might be a pronoun used to facilitate conversation.

Lynch's direction to mislead the public has no legal significance. The government has no duty to tell the truth to the public, only when in a legal proceeding before a judge - and even there, there is tons of wiggle room.

19 posted on 06/08/2017 3:05:50 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nodwam

mark


20 posted on 06/08/2017 3:05:59 PM PDT by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson