HOORAY Devin Nunes
After (especially) the last four years of Bush—AND THEN the eight years of Okenya.................
..........does ANYBODY trust the words of ANYBODY down in that swamp??
It seems that truth tellers (leakers) end up on the side walk with bullets in their backs. (Whilst the cops eat their doughnuts and dissemble.)
“The subpoenas call for the information to be delivered by Wednesday, June 7, 2017.”
unmasking + seth rich + dnc fraud lawsuit + comey/brennan/rice -—> inching toward critical mass
:: is what led to these three subpoenas being issued ::
Question. According to the separation of powers, is it not up to the Executive Branch to follow through on these subpoenas?
Should not the FBI be brought to bear to compel the subject to testify?
It sounds portentious, but, as with all investigations of Progressives, nothing happens and nothing will happen.
IMHO
My pitch to liberals would be
1) If you insist nothing happened, we can go slow
2) Trump has access to all of the data and processes Obama had. Bannon too.
3) If that scares you, we should find out as quickly as possible what Obama’s people did so we can fix the processes and stop Trump/Bannon from misusing intelligence.
4) If you think Trump is colluding with Russia, that means both Trump and Russia have access to data on ALL OF YOU. Do you still insist that our data could not be misused for political purposes?
5) Even if data wasn’t “misused” in the past, help determine how it was “used” by previous administrations to prevent future “misuse”.
6) Are you certain that your 2018 candidates and 2020 presidential candidates are so pure that the best US surveillance won’t harm their chances? What about their families? Campaign staff? The vote counters? Or, do you trust Trump/Bannon to not use US intelligence for that?
7) Do you want to help us find out the extent of Obama’s use of intelligence data where ever that may lead? Or still want to take it slow?
Would this not simply involve Trump instructing his admin to cooperate in full on a timely basis?
Hey, Rocky—Watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat!
Not only Brennan.... "Susan The Sifter" had a dog in this hunt......Hillary tapped her for Secy of State. One could conclude Comey also had his reasons .....to stay on as FBI director.
Mighty powerful incentives for anti-Trump shenanigans.
.......apparently there are records proving that Obama's CIA director, John Brennan, oversaw repeated spying on the phone calls of President Donald Trump and millions of other private American citizens. An audiotape just released by Federal Judge G. Murray Snow is part of a civil case........
Thankfully, Susan's so stupid, her public explanations of her intel activities set her up for a precipitous fall.
=========================================
Taxpayers demand Rice answer questions....and they want answers now. Questions for Rice:
1. When did you request the unmasking, and from which agency?
2. Who in that agency actually did the unmasking? Please provide the written requests you submitted.
3. Once the names were unmasked, did you still believe there was a threat to national security from the named US persons?
4. If so, with whom did you share the information, and what actions were taken to protect America and American citizens?
5. If you did not, then you should not have shared the names with anyone else, so how did the names become known?
6. Why was any of the info detailed here deliberately withheld on the FISA application? (it's a felony to willfully withhold information when applying for a FISA).
=====================================
(HAT TIP OMEGATOO)
<><> If the information found in the ‘incidental’ involvement of any US Person was threatening US Security, and America citizens' safety, why did US security agencies wait for Rice’s request to unmask?
<><> Did Obama issue a secret stand down order?
<><> Why did Rice on PBS initially deny responsibility for the unmasking?
<><> Why was this threat not unveiled at the time or since? Why now?
Alarmingly, the supposed ‘threat’ identified by Rice was about to be inaugurated as President of the US. Shouldn’t Congress have been notified? Why did Rice keep it a secret? Maybe she planned to collude w/ the Clintons to sell the intel to a foreign country?
The NSA didn’t unmask the information initially, plus later investigations found NO collusion between Russia and Trump. Seems to be proof-positive that whatever suspicions Obama/Rice/Brennan may have had to justify the unmasking were absolutely wrong, or more likely non-existent.
=============================================
Capitol Switchboard 1-866-220-0044
Contact your Representative and Senators---demand these questions blanket the media---and demand Susan Rice answer them.
Advice to the empty-scrotum GOP, start with a subpoena. You know the bureaucracy is going to blow you off without one. Perhaps the GOP likes investigations to creep along slowly and to die a pitiful death. After all nothing changes and they look like they are doing something.
Useless, they are useless.
Those who know me know I’m not given to conspiracy theories, but things are aligning here to the point it will be hard not to connect dots.
Kudos to Rodguy911 for this link, but the key is that the Awan Bros were the cleanup crew to expunge evidence of the Seth Rich data. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_iZYyWkFaI
Let’s hope that Nunes gets more results than that hapless Gowdy guy.