Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Overwhelming number of people speak in favor of Seattle income tax (Tax the Rich!)
mynorthwest.com ^ | May 31, 2017 | MYNORTHWEST.COM

Posted on 06/01/2017 7:35:12 AM PDT by PROCON

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: butlerweave

I left Washington state six years ago. They have no income tax at all. It would take a vote of the people to enact such a thing and it always loses. Meanwhile, I now work in Louisville, KY. and, yes, there is a city income tax. Actually, it is the county that the city engulfs, but there are cities here with income taxes. This is an income tax state.

Washington is not.


41 posted on 06/01/2017 8:19:41 AM PDT by Mr. Douglas (Best. Election. EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
The former diamond-shaped economic stratification - with few at the top and bottom, and many in the middle - is being replaced by a pear shaped stratification with an elite at the top and a proletariat, service industry for everyone else.

I have lived in Communist countries. It is absolutely no surprise to me that when the Soviet Union finally collapsed, within a very short time, high-level, politically-connected people (oligarchs) had taken control of all the productive enterprises of the country. I'm not saying the USA is exactly the same, but the more a nation centralizes political power, it ipso facto politicizes everything it touches, and centralize economic power, and thus leads to stagnation as well as outsized benefits to those few in charge.

42 posted on 06/01/2017 8:24:03 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

The people of Seattle should learn a lesson from the US income tax. It started out and was only accepted because it was only on the rich and very rich with a max of 6%. It may start out at 1.5% and only on 250,000 or more. But it will continue to expand because there is a voracious appetite for stolen money.


43 posted on 06/01/2017 8:25:25 AM PDT by all the best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The people have spoken
So Bill Gates, who lives in Medina, WA, would be exempt?

El correcto. No one in their right mind wants to live in the crime-ridden, drug-ridden, vagrant-ridden craphole called Seattle.

44 posted on 06/01/2017 8:28:07 AM PDT by PROCON
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

stupid liberals. The so called rich can avoid taxes with financial planning and just leaving the state. The enemies are destroying themselves.

covfefe
(in the end we win)


45 posted on 06/01/2017 8:29:43 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Not sure if it’s the same elsewhere, but the poverty level in WA in $70K. I never made $70K in my working life and was never considered poor. The idiots in Seattle are delusional.


46 posted on 06/01/2017 8:30:40 AM PDT by Lucky2 (I support President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Stealing other people’s money is immoral even if you vote to do it.

And that’s all this is, stealing. They identify who has money and take it because it is there, no other reason.


47 posted on 06/01/2017 8:32:26 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Ride To The Sound Of The Guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucky2

It’s always been the liberal mantra: “Tax the rich”. If a Seattle income tax is passed, just sit back and watch the exodus.


48 posted on 06/01/2017 8:36:19 AM PDT by SkyDancer (You know they invented wheelbarrows to teach FAA inspectors to walk on their hind legs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Looks like a good time to invest in Redmond, WA real estate.


49 posted on 06/01/2017 8:39:09 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Taxing income at $250,000 or more doesn’t tax the rich. It simply punishes those that are trying to get rich and will make it harder to get rich. The real rich laugh at income based taxes.


50 posted on 06/01/2017 8:43:05 AM PDT by Codeflier (Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama - 4 democrat presidents in a row and counting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
The "rich" have the means to move elsewhere...and they will. Meanwhile, the tax and spend liberals will have ratcheted up the spend side of the equation only to discover the revenue isn't there.
51 posted on 06/01/2017 8:45:56 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mykroar
Those taxpayers do not get a vote, because taxes are generally decided on by residents of the city that imposes them.

I have a similar problem. My employer has "bricks and mortar" in every state and 30 countries. When I travel to another company location, I'm compelled to record the zip code on my time card. The consequence is that I have to file income tax in CA and sometimes NE in addition to my state of residence, ID. CA taxes me, but I have no voice as a voter since I'm an ID resident. Taxation without representation. Frankly, I pay more CA state income tax than many CA state residents.

This year I'm trying to avoid any more visits to San Diego than absolutely required. Instead of the original "one week per month", I've restrained it to one visit total in 2017 as of the current time. Thus far, no calls to Omaha. It only takes ONE visit to either spot to force a W2 and extra state filing.

52 posted on 06/01/2017 8:53:19 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin
Believe it or not, a city council member proposed a "hate speech" fine/tax on Seattle radio stations that carried conservative talk shows.

City attorneys said the pesky 1st Amendment wouldn't allow it.

53 posted on 06/01/2017 9:12:15 AM PDT by PROCON
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

Please study the recent history of CT. There was no income tax in the 80’s. It was installed as a TEMPORARY fixer to the budget deficit. Still here today and the rate go up and up. Businesses go bye and bye. Death spiral.


54 posted on 06/01/2017 9:15:54 AM PDT by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

Heck, there are plenty of cities with an income tax. Kansas City has had an “e-tax” for over twenty years. I think it is currently 1% of gross for those working in the city limits.


55 posted on 06/01/2017 9:23:29 AM PDT by KC Burke (If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
I now agree with them.For years I have felt this country would be socialized by taxing the rich higher than the rest of us. Now I believe the opposite. The more we lower their taxes the more left they become. Socialism is really trendy and when you are rich and find it does not lower your taxes what are you going to do to remain trendy to your fellow fashionistas. That wealthy libs who do not think that any of the money that is spend is wasted (except maybe In defense) should be taxed more is obvious. Since the wealthy Republican donor class does not care any more about it since they are probably loaded with government contracts and are completely apathetic and purposely ineffective at ending even one liberal wasteful program even though they have controlled the house for the last 18 out of 22 years. Then they should pay more as well. Also since both camps are involved in bringing in cheap Democrat labor(and voters) as well as deporting our best jobs then obviously they should pay all the money made form that into taxes. Even the corporate media believe the wealthy should pay more. Since wealthy Republicans have nobody to blame for themselves for not buying media and telling a different story, then that money that should of gone into media should go in taxes as well.Passive do nothing country club Republicanism is no longer any more acceptable than limousine snob liberalism and both need to pay for it instead of us.
56 posted on 06/01/2017 9:45:40 AM PDT by amnestynone (We are asked by people who do not tolerate us to tolerate the intolerable in the name of tolerance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

That’s still half the local income tax Pittsburgh residents pay.


57 posted on 06/01/2017 9:54:11 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2
the left is not stupid....they know what they are doing...

pretend to tax only the "rich" and suddenly, its the upper middle class and then the middle...

Washington is an income tax free state, but they have tried for decades to impose a state income tax...

this Seattle crap is just the start of the process...

58 posted on 06/01/2017 10:40:32 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Flea


59 posted on 06/01/2017 10:40:37 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
Bums that want free bus rides.
This is just a stupid kind of virtue signaling meeting so pissant politicians can be on the news. Seattle is just where a lot of bums moved who can't afford San Fransisco anymore.
60 posted on 06/01/2017 10:49:53 AM PDT by right way right (May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our one and only true hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson