To: boatbums
Exactly!
The thing that amazes me is how some sort of right to a woman’s body in her convenience and excuse from responsibility with what she did with her body trumps the right to life of the baby that results.
20 posted on
05/31/2017 10:50:45 PM PDT by
Wildbill22
( They have us surrounded again, the poor bastards- Gen Creighton William Abramsp)
To: Wildbill22
The thing that amazes me is how some sort of right to a woman’s body in her convenience and excuse from responsibility with what she did with her body trumps the right to life of the baby that results. Because "reproductive health" rights by its own nature demands the rights of the other already born human life and can have no place in the equation, or at least not to the point that it interferes with the purpose.
32 posted on
06/01/2017 5:31:00 PM PDT by
boatbums
(Authority has a way of descending to certitude, and certitude begets hubris.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson