....We can’t be run by the elderly in a city…that, that, that’s foolishness....
Any country that allows and encourages murder of it’s unborn children and horribly disrespects it’s elderly enough to kick them out of their homes for the “public good” is doomed.
And to hear libtardsplain it, it’s rotten capitalist Republicans behind gentrification efforts from coast to coast. The property developers I see are Democrats and they are connected to Democrat city councilmembers and mayors.
They want your stuff because you’re just gon’ waste it anyhow (ask Hitlery Clinton herself).
So like you said, first you eliminate the young, then you eliminate the old. The next step --- inevitably --- is a handy cost-cutter called euthanasia.
It won't be called euthanasia.
Like abortion, it will be called "choice."
First the choice. Then the nudge. Then the push turns to shove.
Mark my words.
And let’s not forget good old Ezekiel Emanuel’s comment with respect to health care. “Seventy-five is old enough, you’ve had enough of a life, time to go because you cost too much to keep alive!”
But being run nationally by geriatric lunatics like Waters (pushing 80), Feinstein (pulling 80), Sanders (pushing 80), McCain (80, but he’s a war hero so he gets to stay until he’s 200), and all the others in the National Flaccid Arms Congressional Rest Home, is A-OK. And, of course, when this idiot hits 80, still in office, it will be fine.
This is already starting to happen as well in California, where the population that benefits from Prop 13, passes in 1978, is also elderly, but it’s okay to target them because they caused the recession.