Click The Pic To Donate
Posted on 05/26/2017 5:19:34 PM PDT by dontreadthis
Washington, DC – Young Richardson, OAN Political Correspondent
Wikileaks released tens of thousands of internal Democratic National Committee emails last summer, with Russia thought to be the source, and just weeks after the release, DNC staffer Seth Rich was fatally killed while walking to his Washington, DC home. Now some Members of Congress are raising questions about these events.
“I do not believe that the evidence at this time proves that the Russians would conclude that the Russians are the the ones who hacked the DNC. We have heard every report from the intelligence groups that are making their reports and they have weasel words in them, and they are based on opinion based on someone who is probably a strong liberal democrat,” says Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-California).
Reports of the Russian hack of the DNC seem to be based on mere opinion says California Congressman Dana Rohrabacher. And Rohrabacher believes other possible alleged sources of the computer breach—potentially including murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich–should be investigated.
“Whoever it could be, we need to look into it and verify. The fact that the young man’s death has not been followed by an investigation that would even be in place for an ordinary murder is very suspicious to me,” Rohrabacher ventures.
And Rohrabacher isn’t the only Member of Congress asking questions. Texas Congressman Blake Farenthold also wonders whether or not the intrusion into the DNC computer server may have been an inside job, potentially by any DNC staffer in a similar position like that of Seth Rich.
“I think it should definitely be a part of the investigation. It’s an alternative theory and any good investigation looks at alternative theories,” observes Rep. Blake Farenthold (R-Texas). “We need to investigate all the options. A lot of the allegations about Russia and some of the allegations about President Trump now are all coming from un-named sources. Sources suggesting it was an inside job are probably just as valid as somebody not willing to give their name.”
With Members of Congress asking questions about the DNC hack, it may be possible there will now be some answers.
Representatives Farenthold and Rohrabacher both need to be congratulated highly for this. I’m strongly considering donating to their future campaigns.
reward now at $375K
“Reports of the Russian hack of the DNC seem to be based on mere opinion”
There entire “case’ is based on opinions from unnamed sources.
This theory might need to be investigated too.......
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/6d9xcm/breaking_ive_found_evidence_that_the_dnc/
We have better investigators here at FR then most of the alphabet networks......can the dots be connected????
I’ve thought this for over a year. I think the first time I ever heard “Russia did it” concerning Democrat emails was out of Podesta’s mouth. I was so surprised when I heard it I laughed thinking they sure did pull that excuse from their behind.
All anyone has to do is Lexus Nexus the first Democrat utterance of “Russia” and “email” and work backwards.
What ever
The Russians and nobody else but the DNC WROTE the Emails
The was “fatally killed”?
The worst possible way to be killed.
Wikileaks released tens of thousands of internal Democratic National Committee emails last summer, with Russia thought to be the source, and just weeks after the release, DNC staffer Seth Rich was fatally killed while walking to his Washington, DC home. Now some Members of Congress are raising questions about these events.
++++
I don’t believe this timeline is correct. Seth Rich was murdered on July 10, 2016 and the DNC dump from Wikileaks occurred about a week later.
Guccifer2 was the do urce who released some DNC material in mid-June and those documents are now under some suspicion since they do not agree exactly with the Wikileaks versions.
Hard for me to take any article seriously that makes that sort of fundamental error with the facts.
That screwed up paragraph of mine above should read:
Guccifer2 was the source who released some DNC material in mid-June and those documents are now under some suspicion since they do not agree exactly with the Wikileaks versions.
As opposed to those non-fatally killed?
I do not believe that the evidence at this time proves that the Russians would conclude that the Russians are the the ones who hacked the DNC.
Say what?
Please subscribe to OAN so they can afford to hire an editor.
SO much information there. I couldn’t get all the way through it, but I’m betting some Freepers will!
By the time the DNC surrenders that hard drive to anyone outside their dirty, crooked, corrupt control, it will be nothing but a bleach-bitted drink coaster.
And unfortunately, it seems undeniable that the FBI appears thoroughly corrupt and controlled by the Clinton crime family.
If the DNC agrees to surrender it to the FBI, that means the fix is in and Trump and Sessions should immediately insert an additional team of honest investigators from outside the FBI to examine it.
we don’t need the hd, we’ve got the metadata:
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/6d9xcm/breaking_ive_found_evidence_that_the_dnc/
Dana Rohrabacher is a good Conservative. A Republican with a spine.
The worst possible way to be killed.
Where have these congressional critters been?
Is someone associated with DNC IT dead? Yup!
Donald Trump once eat Russian salad dressing.
....gee, which lead should to pursue...?!?!
Good to see OAN gaining traction.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.