FBI doesn’t comment on extant investigations. Therefore the media can make up any damned thing they want and run with it.
The press is running hard with this story. There is no “debunking” of press narratives, they just disappear eventually, depending how how well they drive ratings.
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/05/jared-kushner-and-donald-trump-like-father-like-son-in-law
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-05-26/fbi-scrutiny-of-kushner-brings-russia-probe-into-the-white-house
I’ve noted a few times on leftist sites that if Jarad is ‘disposed of’ (politically, of course), then Bannon gets full access to Trump.
Funny how no one ever responds...
Which means the left will just double down on it, because they all know that if you repeat something often enough, it becomes true.
Rush isn’t quite accurate about the Russian intelligence document. Some people thought it was fake, others didn’t, and I don’t think they know for sure to this day. Amazingly, the FBI never even interviewed the people specifically named in the document, including Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Why did they suspect it was fake if they didn’t even do a proper investigation? Something stinks about this.
I've been saying this for quite a while now. This is all pre-emptive because they know the truth is going to come out on the Seth Rich murder by DNC/Hillary/Obama crime syndicate and the illegal surveillance by the Obama administration of Trump and his campaign and transition team, and many, many others. When it finally all comes out, this is going to make the Clinton-era Filegate look amateur in comparison. The public is not going to vote democrat for a century.