Posted on 05/26/2017 10:11:06 AM PDT by Academiadotorg
In this space, we frequently call out left-wing academics out of touch with reality. That might appear to be an ideological bias in and of itself were it not for their overwhelming dominance of academe.
Nevertheless, it behooves us to take note when conservative perceptions, rare as they are in the Ivory Tower, do not match up with reality. "If the vagueness of Trump's policy positions provides an opening for Congress to fill in the details, so does the unconservatism of many of the positions he has specified," Greg Weiner writes in the Spring 2017 issue of Modern Age. "There are voices of constitutional independence in both chambers: Ben Sasse in the Senate, Justin Amash in the House."
"Ryan may be another: he has, for example, championed Medicare reform." With all due respect to all those mentioned, and the political scientist from Assumption College who invoked them, greater Constitutional stalwarts in both chambers come to mind: Senator Mike Lee, to name just one example.
Moreover, Wiener goes on to give the Speaker of the House a characterization few would ascribe to him. “By reputation, Ryan and his Senate counterpart, Mitch McConnell, are not courtiers," Weiner writes. "Between their Reaganism and Trump's Trumpism probably lies a new approach to conservative policy."
Beyond Irish roots, blue eyes and a great head of hair, it is hard to see what attributes Ryan shares with the Gipper. Come to think of it, that was about all Reagan had in common with Ted Kennedy.
Malcolm A. Kline is the Executive Director of Accuracy in Academia. If you would like to comment on this article, e-mail mal.kline@academia.org.
Are there such a thing as conservatives anymore?
Beyond Irish roots, blue eyes and a great head of hair, it is hard to see what attributes Ryan shares with the Gipper.
And Yertle doesn't even have those.
There is nothing worth reading in that post.
>>Are there such a thing as conservatives anymore?
That depends. It’s like looking at a 1969 Ford LTD and asking “why don’t they make cars anymore?” Is he asking why they don’t make that car anymore or is he implying that any car made today “isn’t a real car” since they don’t have a frame underneath or 200 pound steel bumpers?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.