Posted on 05/25/2017 12:18:55 PM PDT by Stopthethreat
"The evidence in the record, viewed from the standpoint of the reasonable observer, creates a compelling case that (the executive order's) primary purpose is religious," the ruling states. "Then-candidate Trump's campaign statements reveal that on numerous occasions, he expressed anti-Muslim sentiment, as well as his intent, if elected, to ban Muslims from the United States."
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
his speeches as a candidate have nothing to do with the law. He’s President now. Bad law by a bad court.
What was the decision, was it split or near unanimous?
You've never seen courts make things up? LOL. It's what they do. Outcome based jurisprudence on hallucinogens.
So if someone else ordered the same thing (like Obama did) it would be OK?
WTF is this crap?
How do morons like this get removed from the bench?
im sorry this is already posted!
SO THEY FOUND “INTENT’ ???
I think this means that the federal courts will not be satisfied until Donald Trump is removed from office. Until then, he will not be allowed to act as President anyway.
It would be too bad if there is a terrorist attack in this country they don’t target the 4th and 9th circuit courts of appeal. Maybe they will go after the one who ordered the attack on Osama.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER, MOTZ, TRAXLER, KING, SHEDD, AGEE, KEENAN, WYNN, DIAZ, FLOYD, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Judges Motz, King, Wynn, Diaz, Floyd, and Harris join this (Gregory) opinion in full, Judge Traxler concurs in the judgment, and Judges Keenan and Thacker concur in substantial part and concur in the judgment.
Niemeyer, Shedd and Agree each wrote a dissent (so three separate dissenting opinions), and each dissenting opinin was signed on to by the other two dissenters.
Yep. Roberts did that twice regarding Obamacare.
Doesn't matter. The Constitution and the Law give the President complete autonomous authority over all matters of immigration.
The courts are ruling outside the boundaries of their constitutional authority.
Thanks!
Why do Republicans always apologize for the slightest little thing?
These judges should be hanged from the tallest tree.
So you are posting ‘very fake news’?
Interesting
The landing page is CNN. I was confused too.
islam is not a religion within the scope of the First Amendment. It is a machination which unchecked, would lead to the complete subordination, if not the total destruction, of every other form of religious and political system and lifestyle.
It is demonstrably Evil as opposed to Good, and that has never changed since its foundation, and is so designed that it never will change.
islam must be essentially destroyed, or it will eventually destroy US.
Intent? It sounds like Comey’s excuse not to prosecute Hillary.
In a real court an objection would be made for speculation, and it would be sustained.
These clowns have strayed far from the purview of the court.
You've never seen courts make things up? LOL. It's what they do. Outcome based jurisprudence on hallucinogens.
Based on this evidence, we find that Plaintiffs have more than plausibly alleged that EO-2's stated national security interest was provided in bad faith, as a pretext for its religious purpose.
The same national interest without this judicial hallucination of bad faith would pass.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.