Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rjsimmon
Agreed. Stealth sounds all well and good, and maybe it is for an attack aircraft, but it really doesn't help a fighter - not the way we are currently using them anyway.

My friend the ex AF fighter pilot has told me that even when he was on active duty (and he has friends still "in the business") the ROE were such that stealth tech and standoff weapons were almost useless to them. Their ROE invariably required a positive ID, which generally meant closing to visual or camera range. That close in, stealth isn't going to prevent a detection. Good airmanship and tactics win the day. So a beast like the -15 that hasn't made compromises in maneuverability for stealth is probably a much better choice - for the way we seem to be using our fighters today.

7 posted on 05/25/2017 6:22:22 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Doing my part to help make America great again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: ThunderSleeps

“Their ROE invariably required a positive ID, which generally meant closing to visual or camera range”

There are other electronic ID methods that do not require closure anywhere near a merge (former A-10 and F-15E driver speaking).

ROE is a “killer” and does takeaway some of the stealth advantage. . .but maybe with Trump the ROE will be modified. . .


15 posted on 05/25/2017 9:50:54 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson