The spin games in this article are just mind boggling. The Dems want to claim that Comey harmed Clinton by recommending NOT to indict her, even though she was obviously guilty, because he feared release of a hearsay report containing claims about a Wasserman-Shwartz email might discredit the DoJ and FBI if Clinton wasn’t indicted.
D’oh — But Comey did recommend NOT to indict Clinton, the facts in the public domain were enough to show us the investigation was a sham, and this purported document was NOT released after the non-indictment. There whole premise is empty. The evidentiary value of what someone says was in an email they can’t produce is precisely zip. So please help me understand how anything abut the document influenced the election. This is total BS as presented.
Which tells us that it is not the actual story.
They’re just trying to plant the idea that the report was “just hearsay.” But since when has hearsay stopped the reporting or use of anything in this affair?
They know it isn’t, but have no way of knowing when the email could come out or any of the supporting evidence could come out.
They know it’s out there.