screen shot pc
Posted on 05/24/2017 8:50:06 AM PDT by HarleyLady27
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz threatened the chief of the U.S. Capitol Police with “consequences” for holding equipment that she says belongs to her in order to build a criminal case against a Pakistani staffer suspected of massive cybersecurity breaches involving funneling sensitive congressional data offsite.
The Florida lawmaker used her position on the committee that sets the police force’s budget to press its chief to relinquish the piece of evidence Thursday, in what could be considered using her authority to attempt to interfere with a criminal investigation.
The Capitol Police and outside agencies are pursuing Imran Awan, who has run technology for the Florida lawmaker since 2005 and was banned from the House network in February on suspicion of data breaches and theft.
“My understanding is the the Capitol Police is not able to confiscate Members’ equipment when the Member is not under investigation,” Wasserman Schultz said in the annual police budget hearing of the House Committee On Appropriations’ Legislative Branch Subcommittee.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Looks like there IS an investigation on the Awan Brothers!
WHO hired the AWAN BROTHERS??? WHO????
About time! Of course the muzzles are probably back home iving in their cave.
Maybe they're setting up Wasserman Slitz to take the fall for others.
If the laptop belongs to the feds and she is using it, it’s not her laptop.
Ooooh...... DWS pulled the trigger on Seth!
DWS is as dirty as they come - she was the lead engineer for the Clinton rigging of the Democratic primaries, as was exposed by Wikileaks. When she was forced to resign in disgrace, she immediately got an honorary job with the Clinton campaign. This is can’t make this stuff up territory with her.
Gee, if the AWANs were paid well-above the going rate for the services rendered, would there be excess funds available to redirect into other special programs?
Would this redirection of cash-flow cross any lines that have specific legal definitions.
Inquiring minds want to know.
Russia-gate via Podestra and Clintons
http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=80194
“...Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair, John Podesta failed to disclose $35 million a Russian entity put into his company. This money came directly from the Kremlin and could be a violation of federal law...”
From PJ Media: Peter Schweizer, president of the Government Accountability Institute and the author of “Clinton Cash,” explained on Fox News Tuesday how a Russia connection to the Clinton campaign and Obama presidency is much bigger and more troubling than anything Democrats have accused Team Trump of. During his appearance on “Fox & Friends,” Schweizer alleged that Clinton campaign chair John Podesta probably violated federal law when he failed to disclose his stock holdings in a Kremlin-funded company. “In 2011, John Podesta joins the board of this very small energy company called Joule Energy based out of Massachusetts,” Schweizer said. “About two months after he joins the board, a Russian entity called Rusnano puts a billion rubles — which is about 35 million dollars — into John Podesta’s company. Now, what is Rusnano? Rusnano is not a private company, Steve. It is a fund directly funded by the Kremlin. In fact, the Russian science minister called Rusnano Putin’s child. So you have the Russian government investing in one of John Podesta’s businesses in 2011, while he is an advisor to Hillary Clinton at the State Department.” “Does anyone in Trump’s circle rise to the level where there’s this kind of money involved?” asked host Steve Doocy.
When she was forced to resign in disgrace
Defend the Capital Police? Yeah right...
I’m thinking there is a Lot of functions and services those police bring to the table, which would be sorely missed on the hill.
A virago moment blurted in a nervous frenzy over the loss of control over incriminating evidence.
So now we have two conniving d’rats who believe they’ve authority to make things difficult for investigators. Donna B. and Debbie Washerwoman Schultz. Await the remaining 8 before renaming this “10 Little Indians” One would suspect that Liawatha would be in the mix somewhere.
The companion to the `rat tactic of `throw as much against the wall as possible and hope something sticks’:
commit so many crimes and ethical violations yourself that no one can keep track. The MSM ignores them anyway.
Hillary Clinton must be shaking like an old mare with a ginger root up her rear end, worrying about the noose.
The law grinds slowly but surely and exceedingly fine.
Murder. Intimidation. Criminal malfeasance. Perjury.
Just for starters. Podesta? Even more disgusting.
Read the thread I just posted on Seth Rich, it ties into this ...
Then arrest her for interfering with a police investigation.
Maybe that’s where AG Sessions has been....building up staff to investigate all of these unresolved Dim scandals.
Remember kiddos, part of the reason the Dems are going batspit crazy is because they took a Hillary victory for granted and knew there would be no investigation of their crimes.
hmmm- obstruction of justice doesn’t count if one is a democrat apparently
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
