Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee statue coming down in New Orleans: Live updates
NOLA.com ^ | 5/19/17

Posted on 05/19/2017 12:12:01 PM PDT by Timpanagos1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: zerosix

It worked so well for Zimbabwe and South Africa.


41 posted on 05/19/2017 1:44:32 PM PDT by myerson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: bert

I think so as well.


42 posted on 05/19/2017 1:55:04 PM PDT by WMarshal (President Trump, a president keeping his promises to the American people. It feels like winning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1

I wonder if all of these statues are being destroyed or stored somewhere?


43 posted on 05/19/2017 1:57:22 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noob1999
I hope the pigeons poop on Obama’s head.
44 posted on 05/19/2017 1:58:39 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
I wonder if all of these statues are being destroyed or stored somewhere?

According to this article Beauregard and his pedestal as well as Davis' pedestal wound up in a city maintenance yard.

45 posted on 05/19/2017 2:03:56 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice
“U.S. Grant also had several slaves, who were only freed after the 13th amendment in December of 1865. When asked why he didn’t free his slaves earlier, Grant stated “Good help is so hard to come by these days.”

An oft repeated and completely false claim.

“Contrarily, Confederate General Robert E. Lee freed his slaves (which he never purchased — they were inherited) in 1862! Lee freed his slaves several years before the war was over, and considerably earlier than his Northern counterparts.”

But a few months after he was required to free them according to his father-in-law's will, which required that they be emancipated within five years of his death. But Lee was occupied during the summer of 1862 so it's understandable that he might be a bit tardy.

46 posted on 05/19/2017 2:08:05 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345

The plan is to move them to a museum setting, thereby keeping their historical context.


47 posted on 05/19/2017 2:11:02 PM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Wonder if they’d be willing to sell it? I bet that someone would be willing to buy it.


48 posted on 05/19/2017 2:15:29 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1

Good.


49 posted on 05/19/2017 2:16:12 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The Mayor of NOLA is Mitch Landrieu and he is corrupt as you might imagine, and comes from a corrupt political family. I think you can probably guess what party he is a member.


50 posted on 05/19/2017 2:50:46 PM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1

Next target... ANDREW JACKSON! HEW OWNED SLAVES so he has to come down! After all, what did HE ever do for New Orleans?

Snark:


51 posted on 05/19/2017 2:52:43 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (That's my story and I'm sticking to it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inyo-Mono

I have the US Grant model 1860 Army boxed Colt.. These were made by the Colt Company with the tools and dies that were used for the originals before they sold them to the Italians.


52 posted on 05/19/2017 2:54:33 PM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
Beauregard's home is located at Chalmette National Military Park on the grounds. I am surprised that the miscreants of NO haven't asked for its removal.
53 posted on 05/19/2017 2:57:32 PM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
Wonder if they’d be willing to sell it? I bet that someone would be willing to buy it.

They should. I think I read somewhere that the people who run Beauvoir were willing to take the Davis statue and would talk about taking the other statues as well. They're works of art; better than scrapping them.

54 posted on 05/19/2017 3:02:04 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

They are nice aren’t they? The Lee and Grant cased commemorative sets made in 1971 were the very first of the 2nd Generation cap and ball revolvers which were later discontinued in 1982. Genuine Colt’s made under the Colt dome in Hartford and the flasks were made in England by Dixon & Sons, the same company that made powder flasks for Colt in the 1850s and ‘60s.


55 posted on 05/19/2017 3:07:44 PM PDT by Inyo-Mono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

Grant owned one slave in his life. That was in the 1858. The slave was given to him by his father in law, Fredrick W. Dent. Even thought he was in dire financial trouble, Gramt gave the slave his freedom, about one year later. The slave would have brought Grant $700-$800 on the market in 1859. Dent allowed 4 female slaves to work for Grant’s wife. Julia did not own them, and Fredrick Dent would not allow them to accompany her when she left the State of Missouri.These slaves were freed April 11, 1865, when the state legislature outlawed slavery in Missouri.


56 posted on 05/19/2017 3:28:51 PM PDT by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

And they are history.


57 posted on 05/19/2017 3:46:36 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: MGunny

“Looks like the guy in the cherry picker does not wish to be identified as the guy who defiled General Lee.”

I believe NO has an ordinance prohibiting masks except during Mardi Gras.


58 posted on 05/19/2017 4:35:29 PM PDT by Boojum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

The war wasn’t about slavery. Slavery was legal in the US. It was about the South seceding. That’s why they were attacked. Almost everyone in the US believed the states had that right. All of the Northern states had threatened to do so at one time or another. It was about control and money.


59 posted on 05/19/2017 4:46:57 PM PDT by Carry me back (Cut the feds by 90%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1

This is really terrible.


60 posted on 05/19/2017 4:47:38 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson