I saw this guy on Fox 'n Friends this morning.
Case exposed and closed.
President Trump has been correct all along.
SICK, SCHEMING HOAX.
John Brennan needs to be put on a polygraph, indicted, tried and imprisoned right along with Hillary and I dare say, accompanied by several elected-office-holding democrats too.
One of the most poorly written headlines in history.
But good read if you get beyond the headline...
Fred Fleitz is senior vice president for policy and programs with the Center for Security Policy, a national security think tank. Follow him on Twitter@FredFleitz.
The whole Russia, Russia, Russia thing was a complete projection of what a Russian wet dream might look like on a perfect day. It never happened. There is no evidence that it happened. Any investigation is a total futile effort by underlings to attempt to find something to make their boss happy, but it is not to be found. A complete waste of taxpayer resources in an attempt to attack the one that defeated Her Thighness.
As I used to comment on minor cases - This investigation is complete as evidence does not support a presentation to the U.S. Attorney, and it is also the known attitude of the U.S. Attorney to decline prosecution on a case without sufficient evidence to support a charge.
Whether the panel was biased is only a part of the problem. The other part is a presumption that we always have to trust anyone who is an establishment-credentialed intelligence expert without demanding to see their facts and data. This issue is too important to be left to the experts.
Second biggest hoax in history (next to Global Warming)
It’s a perfect `rat scam: it salves Hillary!’s butthurt and defames President Trump.
Of course the only problem is—not a bit of it is true.
Democrats decide what result they want, then assign `experts’ to support that conclusion: it’s pure Lysenkoism.
If we had a halfway credible press they would be laughed out of town. Or run out of town on a rail.
“John Brennan needs to be put on a polygraph,”
Waterboard, maybe.
Polygraph, unreliable.
And close a few of his bank accounts.
“A major problem with this process is that it gave John Brennan, CIA’s hyper-partisan former director, enormous influence over the drafting of the ICA. Given Brennan’s scathing criticism of Mr. Trump before and after the election, he should have had no role whatsoever in the drafting of this assessment. Instead, Brennan probably selected the CIA analysts who worked on the ICA and reviewed and approved their conclusions. “
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I’d personally like to see this blankety-blank-blank waterboarded .... polygraphing is too civilized for the traitorous Brennan.
Who in the world trusts Muslim converts in our intelligence services??? Are we crazy?
Saw the interview also and he also mentioned that the report was based on logic NOT evidence, or intuition, along with the “hand-picked” explanation he gave.
Look for the video to appear on this channel
https://www.youtube.com/user/securefreedom/feed
Here he is 2 days ago.
2:49 Minutes
The Center’s Fred Fleitz discussing the firing of FBI director James Comey
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpMHbOXNtW4
Muh Russia! Trump is guilty!
Still every day, like Geraldo Rivera, these “reporters” open the vault to show us their proof, and their vault of facts is ...EMPTY
Thanks to: Steven Tyler for the above!
There, fixed it!
So much for the "all 17 agencies" talking point that we heard incessantly for months.
Just dropping this tidbit here.
FLASHBACK:
Email-ID 988902
Date 2010-05-24 19:06:11
From sean.noonan@stratfor.com
To analysts@stratfor.com
Re: [OS] US/CT- 5/22- James R. Clapper Jr. is the leading candidate
for national intelligence position
Quick update: A couple articles below on DNI replacement. It seems many
of those interviewed have turned the job down. Civilians won’t take it.
Panetta laughed off a suggestion that he would be the only one with
political clout to make the ODNI work (though he’s NOT one of the rumoured
replacements). The cliche goes that if a military man gets a request from
the Commander-in-Chief, he follows it.
That leaves Clapper.
McCarthy WAS right you know....commies are everywhere..!
This is a keeper. Those lousy $^!//!/@%÷$rs, treasonous rats. I hope they all hang. What a ball and chain this nonsense has been from the beginning. Cut it loose and this administration will soar and us along with it.
Obama illegally SPIED on the Trump campaign and simply had to come up with some BOGUS justification for doing so, to be CRAMMED DOWN OUR THROATS AFTER THE FACT. The 'Russia' thing was such justification, 100% BOGUS.
liberals believe what the want to believe, all the need is a little encouragement thrown out there and they gobble it right up. Now the average liberal on the street thinks Trump is an insane fascist dictator hated by everyone (left and right) and is hanging by a thread with impeachment and removal coming at any moment
On the flip side, you have to wonder why Trump, who is the chief executive officer of all 17 intelligence agencies, has not figured this out.
Why has Trump allowed the alleged Russian election interference issue to publicly fester for the last four months?
Why hasn't Trump identified the two dozen “handpicked experts” so other intelligence experts can judge if the two dozen were actually biased.
Why hasn't Trump released a redacted version of the report that Comey, Clapper, and the third guy wrote?
Personally, I think this whole Russian issue is a steaming pile of political poop.
But Trump has done nothing serious to dispel the cloud of suspicion that has been created by the Democrats and the MSM.
I really wish we could get to the bottom of this. I believe that Trump didn’t collude with the Russians, and I’m skeptical that Russia even hacked the election in the first place.
The idiots on CNN the other day actually said that Trump is obsessed with Russia and isn’t focusing on other things! Those liars! THEY are the ones obsessed with Russia. They are trying to use it to delegitimize his Presidency!
How do we get past this? How do we end this? How do you prove a negative? I don’t think they will prove he did anything (although I sometimes fear they will manufacture “evidence”), but if they don’t, how long will they drag this out?
Would a special prosecutor be faster and better? Serious questions.