Not at all, of course not. Sorry you read some sort offense into my help. I'm happy to ignore you if you prefer. I figure the jurisdiction link was unnecessary, and by posting it with a "glutton for punishment (or insomniac)" preface, meant to mock Congress for such a complex jurisdictional statement.
Well... when someone winds up with an “insomniac or glutton for punishment” reference, I guess I could find it an indication of disdain. If you didn’t mean it that way, fine.
I didn’t ask you to ignore me either. Did I...
I said that if it bothered you that others didn’t understand the topic as well as you did, perhaps you should not pipe up to express your knowledge on the subject.
I didn’t ask you not to pipe up.
I do appreciate the information.