Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump State Department Fights to Keep Clinton Benghazi E-mails Secret
The New American ^ | 08 May 2017 | Joe Wolverton, II, J.D.

Posted on 05/08/2017 4:53:41 PM PDT by detective

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
The State Department is still engaging legal maneuvering to keep Hillary Clinton from being held accountable for her betrayal of the Americans who perished at the Benghazi attack.
1 posted on 05/08/2017 4:53:41 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: detective

Good news!

I mean, we HAVE to cut the budget SOMEWHERE, right..?

Seems to me that the State Dept. just cut RIGHT TO THE FRONT OF THE LINE.

Flying’s expensive, you guys can learn to ROW (across oceans).


2 posted on 05/08/2017 4:55:39 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

This old American does not trust the ‘New American’...

More fake news? If it is true, I trust the President KNOWS what he is doing - drain the swamp = MAGA!


3 posted on 05/08/2017 4:59:22 PM PDT by heterosupremacist (Domine Iesu Christe, Filius Dei, miserere me peccatorem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Unbelievable!


4 posted on 05/08/2017 4:59:31 PM PDT by Faith65 (Isaiah 40:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

They may be protecting sources and methods in the interest of national security. Did that occur to you?


5 posted on 05/08/2017 5:01:00 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective; 2ndDivisionVet

Some thing look bad on the surface, but there may be some reasonable explanations for this.

Up thread 2ndDivisionVet came up with a reasoned opinion on this.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3551295/posts?page=5#5


6 posted on 05/08/2017 5:03:46 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Happy days are here again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heterosupremacist

More fake news? If it is true, I trust the President KNOWS what he is doing -


Not everything is “Fake news’ and this is an example of scratching each other’s back. They all do it and Trump will do it, but probably not as much.


7 posted on 05/08/2017 5:05:07 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals/Progressives.have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: detective

I wouldn’t put too much into the way this is written.


8 posted on 05/08/2017 5:05:41 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Faith65
More than "unbelievable"

Just plain old fashioned bull$hit cover-up!

9 posted on 05/08/2017 5:07:53 PM PDT by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: detective
Sometimes we have to use things we don't like in order to catch things we don't like...

National Security is the President's main function, there could be things in these emails that could really harm our Nation and our people in other countries, military, ambassadors, etc...

President Trump knows what is in the emails, rest assured, therefore, he knows what he is doing...

This article, written by ??? I have never heard of them have you???

10 posted on 05/08/2017 5:09:01 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 ( "The Force Awakens!!!"...Trump and Pence: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal
While I am in the curious and irritated mode,
who killed Jack Kennedy?

11 posted on 05/08/2017 5:09:30 PM PDT by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

While I am in the curious and irritated mode,
who killed Jack Kennedy?


Some very bad people were behind it.


12 posted on 05/08/2017 5:11:37 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals/Progressives.have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All

Well we know the state department is an entrenched snake pit filled with career leftist hacks.


13 posted on 05/08/2017 5:12:03 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

National security left the building a long time ago. The US public are the only ones that don’t know what’s in those emails. That’s the whole point.


14 posted on 05/08/2017 5:13:10 PM PDT by SanchoP (Any compromise with evil is still evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All
(Excerpt) Read more at judicialwatch.org ... On September 15, in a telephone call with then-Egyptian Foreign Minister Mohamed Amr, then-Secy Clinton emphatically portrayed the “stupid, very offensive film” as the root cause of the Benghazi violence.

Clinton told Amr, “I have repeatedly, as has the President and other officials in our government, deplored not only the content of this stupid, very offensive film… But we have to exercise more self-discipline… otherwise we’ll be in a vicious downward circle against everyone who has ever felt offended, particularly on the internet….”

After referring to Benghazi, Secy Clinton’s telephone call with then-Egyptian Foreign Minister Mohamed Amr also contained a curious reference to what the former secretary referred to as a “very successful investment visit led by my deputy Tom Nides, and on the very day they left, this series of incidents began to unfold.”

According to the Washington Post, Nides, who was deputy secretary for management and resources at the State Department, was at the same time responsible for “communications with donors” to the Clinton Foundation.

Nides was also involved in the earlier scandal involving Clinton’s efforts to provide special access to State Department officials for hedge fund clients of her son-in-law, Marc Mezvinsky (fund shuttered after his Greece investment debacle).

15 posted on 05/08/2017 5:13:29 PM PDT by Liz (Shutting down conservatives' free speech is a form of hate speech. samtheman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“They may be protecting sources and methods in the interest of national security”

From the article:

“Immediately, the State Department asked Judge Jackson so reconsider her order, claiming that due to an internal “mistake” the office failed to label the e-mails “classified.” If so labeled, Clinton’s e-mails would be exempt from production under FOIA Exemption B(1). Responding to State’s request, Judicial Watch filed documents averring that the Trump administration’s failure was not a mistake, but rather a deliberate attempt by officials at the State Department to shield Hillary Clinton and themselves by “avoiding identifying e-mails on Clinton’s unofficial, non-secure e-mail server as classified.”
In other words, the e-mails were originally said to be “unclassified” so then-Secretary Clinton would not be guilty of having classified material on her private server, but now that people want to see the e-mails, they are said to be “classified,” and were only mistakenly labeled “unclassified.””

““Judicial Watch’s filing cites an interview of an FBI employee who told federal investigators that top State Department official Patrick Kennedy pressured the FBI to keep Clinton’s e-mails unclassified. The employee told the FBI he ‘believes STATE ha[d] an agenda which involves minimizing the classified nature of the CLINTON emails in order to protect STATE interests and those of CLINTON.’””

These were emails summarizing Obama’s phone calls at the time of Benghazi.

Originally, though under subpoena, they were not available because they were illegally hidden on Clinton’s private server. The State Department stated at the time that they were unclassified.

Now, after being ordered to produce them, the State Department has suddenly decided that the emails should be labelled classified.


16 posted on 05/08/2017 5:15:57 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

See post #16.


17 posted on 05/08/2017 5:17:22 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: detective

Thanks for the response.

So now they are playing the patty cake patty cake game, classified/not classified/classified/not classified...

Hopefully Trump will clean house severely at state one of these days.


18 posted on 05/08/2017 5:21:14 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Happy days are here again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Excellent point. What seems good to ‘feel’ today could turn to nightmares when the shoe is on the other foot. I would, however love for someone to go on the record, under oath, in front of a special prosecutor and let truth determine the outcome.


19 posted on 05/08/2017 5:21:33 PM PDT by richardtavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: detective
That's because it is still, sadly, Obama's State Department.

When is Trump going to do something about that?

20 posted on 05/08/2017 5:23:56 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson