This kid certainly doesn't seem to have been doing anything for which he deserved to get shot.
So why are police firing into the vehicle? If they were firing at the driver, apparently they didn't do a very good job at that.
Story #1—"they were backing right toward more police—has already been debunked, apparently, so it's time for story #2, I guess.
Just damn. May justice be served...
Sounds like #1 was actually #2....
Is this the age of fragmented, incoherent news, or what?
Where is the old rule for,assigning who, what, when, where, why and how? Everything is by smoke signal now. Is this trend on purpose?
One big dark hole, so the affected interested groups have time to freak out, and call in their target to their compadres from the hood, in NYC, led by Reverend Al Sharpton.
Wonder if Al has booked his hotel suite already.
There was a shooting in Baton Rouge, LA, when Obama was still president, and Obama said a bunch of dumb things about that NOT KNOWING THE FACTS.
The facts I heard about that shooting was:
1. Suspect was 300 lbs with long criminal record.
2. Homeless person called police about suspect waving a gun (which is why police were called to the scene).
3. When two police officers were wrestling with this guy who is 300 pounds (or more) on the ground, the suspect went for his gun.
Yet our IDIOT president then (Obama) mouthed off about this as though the police were at fault, and then there were shootings that targeted police in Dallas and Baton Rouge (and maybe other places).
Any dead police/wounded police from these shootings were DIRECTLY the fault of OUR INCOMPETENT KENYAN PRESIDENT.