[Norseman]

What’s even more delicious about this brouhaha is that Bret Stephens, the author of the NYTimes editorial, just recently left the WSJ editorial page where he was far and away the most critical person of President Trump (before and especially after the election, certain we’d elected a budding despot).

Now he claims the hate mail he’s getting from the NYTimes readers is even worse than what he was getting from WSJ readers when he was writing about Trump. And that on a middle-of-the-road article, to boot.

Well, at least he’s making a name for himself.

[Mrs. Don-o]

Crazy thing is, Bret Stephens didn't even "dispute" anthropogenic climate change. He practically stipulated it from the outset. He just said other hypotheses can still be considered, questions can still be raised, and spurious "certainty" should be rejected.

For this, he´s a planet-destroying, hurricane-causing, puppy-crushing fascist.

Consensus Clubhouse. Please check your brain at the door. You won´t be needing it.