Climate experts: Global warming doubts are 'real science'

wnd.com ^ | 4/29/2017 | Bob Unruh

[rktman]

A number of Ph.Ds have written a book chapter asserting that doubts about the theory of human-caused global warming should be considered “real science.”

You know, the idea of basing hypotheses on documented evidence rather than a political agenda.

But the National Science Teachers Association wants nothing to do with such an approach.

Its executive director, David Evans, has written a letter to members insisting they must teach the agendas of the National Wildlife Federation, the North American Association for Environmental Education, the Campaign for Environmental Literacy, the Center for Climate Change Communication and other activist groups.

What they must avoid, he contends, is the information compiled by the scientists who wrote “Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming.”

[rktman]

Print version so you don't have to see manbearpig's visage on the regular version. Anyway, apparently "A number of Ph.D's" didn't get the memo from manbearpig/leo de crapio about the rising sea levels. We're dealing with rising lake levels here in the Truckee Meadows are. Of course that could be due to the YUGE amounts of precip this winter. So, with grant money at stake, of course there will be deniers who deny that AGW is, for the most part, a giant money making scam.

[rktman]

If you just gotta see manbearpig, here’s the link to the original article:

http://www.wnd.com/2017/04/climate-experts-global-warming-doubts-are-real-science/

[P.O.E.]

Heartland Institute Replies to the National Science Teachers Association

Link to get PDF of original docs

[rktman]

Thanks.

[sauropod]

Bkm

[sauropod]

Bkm

[sauropod]

Bkm

[sauropod]

Bkmk