Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldGuard1

That’s right.....and no talks until there’s ‘action moving in the direction of disarming’... I understand.


17 posted on 04/29/2017 1:29:20 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: caww

Exactly. Trump is on exactly the right path. Get everyone to make statements condemning the DPRK’s missile and nuclear testings and as many countries as possible to impose sanctions, under the grounds of getting the DPRK to admit that it’s willing to consider disarming, wherein they can go to the negotiating table. If the DPRK refuses to admit being willing to disarm, or refuses to reach a disarmament deal in negotiations, then the US can attack with some degree of “we tried everything we could” cover. Meanwhile, the US can move that time to continue to move more assets into the theater.

Three carrier groups en route. One mistral (for whatever that’s worth... but more planes is more planes). Heavy augmentation of US ground forces. All of the ROK forces. Our troops will have what they need to do this effectively, to keep safe, quickly push the DPRK out of range of the south and away from their tunnels, and intercept the ballistic threat and coastal threats. The opening wave will be historic in scale - attacks across the DPRK from a huge number of assets all arriving simultaneously.

Thank God that Trump is president. Can you imagine if Clinton had been in charge of seeing us through this?


22 posted on 04/29/2017 1:40:25 PM PDT by OldGuard1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson