Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

First of all, this tranSEXUAL (the proper word) stuff is PURELY COSMETIC - I.E., PURELY ELECTIVE.

Thus, any hospital should have the right to refuse an elective issue.

Next, I hear Johns Hopkins stopped doing this years ago because they think the risks outweigh the benefits (including PSYCHOLOGICAL issues). Why don’t they go for Hopkins? Why bother these little places?


14 posted on 04/28/2017 7:51:45 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: the OlLine Rebel

In general, it’s contrary to Catholic moral doctrine to remove (or destroy the normal function of) a healthy organ. She would have (or at least should have) gotten the same answer if she had thought amputees were cool and had asked to have her arm cut off.


25 posted on 04/28/2017 8:01:10 AM PDT by Campion (Halten Sie sich unbedingt an die Lehre!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: the OlLine Rebel

Hopkins quit doing these surgeries because their studies showed the patients were better served by serious mental health interventions.

Delusional thinking should not be treated surgically


36 posted on 04/28/2017 8:30:10 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson