Posted on 04/27/2017 3:32:54 PM PDT by TomGuy
Judicial Watch today released new State Department documents including a declaration from FBI Special Agent E.W. Priestap, the supervisor of the agencys investigation into Hillary Clintons email activities, stating that the former secretary of state was the subject of a grand jury investigation related to her BlackBerry email accounts.
(Excerpt) Read more at judicialwatch.org ...
Hmm... I think I will wait for a more formal statement!
The past track record is not too good here.
What matters to me is: What were the Grand Jury’s findings and recommendations? Did they recommend indictment, or no-bill? If indictment, why was this buried?
Why?
Because the e mail investigation is secondary to the larger Clinton Foundation investigation
Everybody here should already know this, but, Grand Juries have ALWAYS been an effective tool for Prosecutors to HIDE EVIDENCE of CRIMINALITY.
They produce certain evidence and with hold certain evidence to a Grand Jury, Not enough evidence is ever presented to get an Indictment, but the Evidence submitted to the Grand Jury is Now SECRET AND LOST FOREVER, which makes Prosecution impossible due to the Grand Jury Secrecy Rules.
Was the Grand Jury from one neighborhood of Washington DC?
Then where in the hell is the Grand Jury.? Taking a vacation for a few hundred years. One thing President Trump should do is get with Sessions and start an investigation on all this crap and get it moving if so.
I’m skeptical of how aggressively the DOJ/FBI persued their case with the GJ.
And whether they omitted relevant information.
OK... how's that going? Or is it buried?
Hmm... I think I will wait for a more formal statement!
The past track record is not too good here.
******************
LOL
I see you’ve been around long enough to remember Larry Klayman....
you are just a peon and not entitled to know
you have no valid need
Thanks for clearing that up for me.
he was present at two Freeper Inaugural Balls
Larry Klayman does not run Judicial Watch anymore. It actually produces results (or releases info at least) now.
I know he doesn’t and didn’t say he did.
“What were the Grand Jury’s findings and recommendations?”
MIght as well have not been a “grand jury” but an inquiry by the prior administration’s politburo.
IMHO
That might be the real reason Bill and Loretta had that tarmac meeting...
“They produce certain evidence and with hold certain evidence to a Grand Jury, Not enough evidence is ever presented to get an Indictment, but the Evidence submitted to the Grand Jury is Now SECRET AND LOST FOREVER, which makes Prosecution impossible due to the Grand Jury Secrecy Rules.”........
And there my FR friends is the “rest of the story”.
Not sure if bringing charges against Hitlary for the activities of the Clinton Foundation would mean bringing in the “evidence” that was withheld. Need some expertise on that one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.