Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saudi Arabia Just Got Elected to the UN Commission on....Women's Rights
Town Hall ^

Posted on 04/24/2017 11:16:33 AM PDT by TigerClaws

Saudi Arabia Just Got Elected to the UN Commission on....Women's Rights

Saudi Arabia continues to have a male guardianship system that dominates all aspects of life for women and girls, they’re also banned from driving cars and do not share the same legal status as men. But yet, the Kingdom was elected to the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women.

The commission, according to its website, is “dedicated to the promotion of gender equality and the empowerment of women.”

Making matters worse, the election took place in a secret vote during the U.N.’s Economic and Social Council.

UN Watch’s executive director rightfully slammed the move.

“Electing Saudi Arabia to protect women’s rights is like making an arsonist into the town fire chief,” Hillel Neuer said. “It’s absurd.”

According to UN Watch, there is a small silver lining to the election.

The only good news: thanks to the U.S. calling a vote — breaking with the Obama Administration policy which in 2014 allowed Iran to be elected by acclamation — Saudi Arabia was not elected by acclamation, but instead received the least votes of any other country: 47 out of 54 votes cast, even though there was no competition given that there was an equal amount of competitors for available seats.

China and Uganda were upset, preferring the usual practice of rubber stamping clean slates.

Good grief.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 04/24/2017 11:16:33 AM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

And what does that tell you about the UN?


2 posted on 04/24/2017 11:29:29 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

What does that tell you about the countries who voted for Saudi and the UN in general?


3 posted on 04/24/2017 11:37:35 AM PDT by Sasparilla ( I'm Not tired of Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Evidently the UN needed an “opposing view” to the question of whether women have rights or not.


4 posted on 04/24/2017 11:44:33 AM PDT by drop 50 and fire for effect ("Work relentlessly, accomplish much, remain in the background, and be more than you seem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

That’s like having China, Cuba and Venezuela on the UN Human Rights Commission.....oh, wait


5 posted on 04/24/2017 12:02:08 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

A true oxymoron.


6 posted on 04/24/2017 12:15:42 PM PDT by coincheck (Time is Short, Salvation is for Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Three of the member nations offer little to no women’s rights. Typical U(seless)N(othings) procedure.


7 posted on 04/25/2017 8:44:45 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson