So i guess we should follow Obunghole’s so-successful policy of “leading from behind” with our thumbs up our asses.
None of these losers have any notion of what Trump is doing or planning. It’s typical unsubstantiated conjecture and BS.
But when the Norks toss a missile at Hawaii they’ll come screaming from the other side.
Please enlighten me on their military experience, especially on the Korean peninsula. What? Well, I have some, including early-warning analyst for the DMZ, writing a twice a day report that went to the president of the United States. On my next assignment there I kept track of three North Korean corps. But nobody asked me, did they?
So says the same knuckleheads that told us he could never win the election and laughed at him until election night.
“methodical planning, every step is very calculated”
Only if by “methodical planning” you mean kicking the can down the road.
‘The era of strategic patience is over,” Pence said, referring to President Obama’s nonconfrontational approach to North Korea.’
http://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-south-korea-pence-20170417-story.html
That's not calling Trump a "madman". The headline is misleading.
Maggots.
Trump has moved the ball further on North Korea than the previous three presidents combined.
Heck, Clinton signed off on them getting nuclear weapons. He and Jimmy Carter worked the magic.
When it comes in to destroying America the left is, to use a Texas Hold ‘em term, All In!
They have Nuclear Weapons because of the previous Presidents Clinton and Obama! I would like to think that within our government we have leaders who will not violate The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.
The previous administration would simply load pallets of cash on a private jet and deliver it to the fat boy. That’s what a true “Mad Man” would do.
That was the snow job that BO had going with them. He convinced them that his do nothing to cause anything to be resolved approach was himself being stable, methodical, and calculating, and oh so intellectual. They believed, even the world was becoming a complete disaster. He did many things to bring about much destruction, but they were so enamored with his "cool" that they were blind to reality.
Actually, this is good that they talk like this. . .let’s hope the Norks are watching. . .Hey, NORKS. .our guy is a friggen MADMAN. . .even WE don’t know what he capable of doing. . .RUN FOR THE HILLS,. . .INCOMING!!!
MSNBC is still around???
Anyhow, how are they relevant?
It’s not as if Trump is going to listen to the delusional and irrational and irrelevant left-wing nutjobs.
And, hey, didn’t Trump just show the lefties how it’s done with NK? I guess they didn’t want to have their blowhard former president be shown how things are done.
It’s good to finally have a president who is being listened to and respected around the world. No more permanently apologizing stooge as president.
I stopped reading at MSNBC, did I miss anything?
(Pics from Phil Collins Land of Confusion music video)
It was back in the 80's and Ron Reagan had just been elected. What was the Democrat's meme? That RR was a rank amateur at foreign policy. A madman. A war hawk that would envelop the world in nuclear flame, either deliberately or through ineptitude.
Starting to sound familiar?
Ron not only didn't ruin the world, he transformed it. The hostages came back from Iran and the Berlin wall came down. The Soviets Union was bankrupt and no longer a union as Eastern European states broke away from it. Communism was in full retreat, worldwide.
Khadaffi was hiding in his palace, no longer threatening anyone. The Cuban army was swimming back home from Granada, defeated.
Consumer confidence had shaken off the Carter Malaise and the economy soared. The USA was feared and respected just about everywhere in the world.
Trump is now getting the same treatment Reagan did at first. Will he prove his detractors wrong and rise to greatness like Reagan did? Time will tell.
Crowley is a reptile with a long bio. E.g. New York times article from 2006:
“Next,” Michael Crichton’s new novel about the perils of biotechnology, has not proved as polarizing as his previous thriller, “State of Fear,” which dismisses global warming. But one of the new book’s minor characters — Mick Crowley, a Washington political columnist who rapes a baby — may be a literary dagger aimed at Michael Crowley, a Washington political reporter who wrote an unflattering article about Mr. Crichton this year.