Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beijing has reason to be pleased with how the Trump-Xi meet went
China Post (TAIWAN) ^ | 13 April 2017 | Frank Ching

Posted on 04/13/2017 8:47:03 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo

Chinese leader Xi Jinping's two-day summit meeting with Donald Trump, overshadowed by the U.S. attack on Syria, gave each president the chance to take the measure of the other and, apparently, each liked what he saw. From the Chinese perspective, things went very well indeed, with China taking the initiative and the Americans going along.

It wasn't supposed to be like that. Trump had plans to pressure Xi to reduce the U.S. trade deficit. Trump also expected Xi to "step up" and help rein in North Korea. Neither thing happened.

From the beginning, China felt it had the situation under control. Rex Tillerson had shown willingness to placate China by adopting its vocabulary — "no conflict, no confrontation, mutual respect and win-win cooperation" — to describe the relationship.

A major commentary published in the People's Daily April 1, was headlined "Xi Jinping's big diplomatic move draws global attention."

It discussed Xi's state visit to Finland, followed by his tete-a-tete in Palm Springs with Donald Trump. This, the official party paper indicated, was Xi's initiative.

Indeed, the Mar-a-Lago meeting was a big diplomatic move by Xi. After months in which Trump, first as candidate, then as president-elect, and finally as president, castigated China for "raping" the U.S., for "stealing" American jobs and then announcing that he might depart from the "One China" policy adopted by the U.S. since the 1970s, China decided that it had to rein him in.

Beijing's first notable success was when Trump promised Xi over the phone that he would abide by the "One China" policy after all.... (Exerpt)


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: americanintokyo; china; deficit; establishment; onechina; savingface; taiwan; trade; trump; xi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last
To: trebb
The Bill by Ryan was flawed, but it pointed us in the right direction and had the best chance of broad enough support to pass

Right direction my foot. Did Pelosie compromise when she did this to us?

41 posted on 04/15/2017 9:57:50 AM PDT by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
Right direction my foot. Did Pelosie compromise when she did this to us?

It was a step in the right direction - the Repubs cannot ever stick together which make it really hard to get some of their supposed agendas started. Pelosi and the Dims stood solid as they screwed us royally; anything that lessens that screwing is a step in the right direction.

42 posted on 04/16/2017 2:46:46 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson