One post described “incidental” thusly:
If the target of the surveillance has phone conversations w/ others NOT being surveilled, the latter are considered “incidental” ....... persons that may often reveal info that is pertinent to the surveillance issue.
“If the target of the surveillance has phone conversations w/ others NOT being surveilled, the latter are considered “incidental” ....... persons that may often reveal info that is pertinent to the surveillance issue.”
\
In other words, they can NAIL anybody they want, and CALL the act anything they want.NO case file, unless they WANT one Justice is served
We have to change this.
(in a pig’s eye)