Help explains all the nuances used by the inside people to explain way "not wiretapping", no knowledge, and how such survellience can be contacted with no trace.
To: georgiarat
As I have stated repeatedly here and elsewhere, in the case of electronic surveillance, there is no longer any such thing as incidental collection.
2 posted on
04/13/2017 7:56:26 AM PDT by
ManHunter
(You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
To: georgiarat
Additionally, U.S. Presidents have the power to issue secret presidential directives that can authorize otherwise illegal acts (theoretically in the countrys best interests). These directives may come with pre-planned cover stories to be used in the event the operation is exposed, and they come with indemnity for those involved, giving them permission to lie about the operation or their involvement without fear of prosecution. aka: taqiyya
the islamization of american
3 posted on
04/13/2017 7:59:03 AM PDT by
thinden
To: georgiarat
Long live Sharyl Attkisson ,,, one of the worlds best investigative reporters alive today .
4 posted on
04/13/2017 7:59:52 AM PDT by
Lionheartusa1
()-: ISIS is Islam without the lipstick :-()
To: georgiarat
We knew this but it’s good to see it in print and verified.
6 posted on
04/13/2017 8:10:02 AM PDT by
bgill
(CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
To: georgiarat
Summary: The president and/or the intel agencies can do pretty much anything they want. And, with a compliant media eager to bring down Republican politicians, they WILL do just about anything.
To: georgiarat
Good information.
9 posted on
04/13/2017 8:20:46 AM PDT by
ptsal
To: georgiarat
From the article: “If the work of targeting an individual cannot be accomplished by government intel officers, it can be contracted out to third parties or to foreign parties who arent bound by U.S. law.”
For example, the FBI might contract with Christopher Steele ... or, “Russian hackers”.
To: Liz; LucyT; stephenjohnbanker; MrB; Mr. K; sickoflibs; Chickensoup
Additionally, U.S.
Presidents have the power to issue secret presidential directives that can authorize otherwise illegal acts (theoretically in the countrys best interests). These directives may come with pre-planned cover stories to be used in the event the operation is exposed, and they come with indemnity for those involved, giving them permission to lie about the operation or their involvement without fear of prosecution.
FYI
15 posted on
04/13/2017 10:11:36 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(Unmasked reports transferred face-to-face at obscure airport: Obama to Lynch to Bill Clinton?)
To: Liz; LucyT; stephenjohnbanker; MrB; Mr. K; sickoflibs; Chickensoup
Additionally, U.S. Presidents have the power to issue secret presidential directives that can authorize otherwise illegal acts (theoretically in the countrys best interests). These directives may come with pre-planned cover stories to be used in the event the operation is exposed, and they come with indemnity for those involved, giving them permission to lie about the operation or their involvement without fear of prosecution.FYI
16 posted on
04/13/2017 10:12:01 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(Unmasked reports transferred face-to-face at obscure airport: Obama to Lynch to Bill Clinton?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson