They filibustered using an avowed racist so all men would be treated equal under the law? /S
1 posted on
04/06/2017 4:54:51 PM PDT by
Vendome
To: Vendome
2 posted on
04/06/2017 5:02:29 PM PDT by
sagar
To: Vendome
I wish every person would remember, it’s not the Democratic party, it’s the Democrat Party, and call every journalist, news reader, politician to task for their refusal to state correctly that fact.
4 posted on
04/06/2017 5:05:42 PM PDT by
cabbieguy
("I suppose it will all make sense when we grow up")
To: Vendome
the avowed racist was none other than al gore sr, cast the tie breaking vote to defeat the bill
7 posted on
04/06/2017 6:07:30 PM PDT by
mt tom
To: Vendome
What a master stroke of...luck...that the Rs put something up to filibuster on this day...
8 posted on
04/06/2017 6:07:44 PM PDT by
Principled
(OMG I'm so tired of all this winning....)
To: Vendome
The civil rights act needs to be revisited, for various reasons of government over reach.
10 posted on
04/06/2017 6:17:42 PM PDT by
farming pharmer
(www.sterlingheightsreport.com)
To: Vendome
There were a couple of provisions of dubious constitutionality, or even more Republicans would have voted for it.
11 posted on
04/06/2017 7:05:17 PM PDT by
TBP
(0bama lies, Granny dies.)
To: Vendome
12 posted on
04/07/2017 6:14:58 PM PDT by
Vendome
(I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson