Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Neil Gorsuch Could Rule on These 3 Big Cases If He Joins Supreme Court Soon
The Daily Signal ^ | 2/1/2017 | Fred Lucas

Posted on 04/06/2017 12:43:33 PM PDT by scooby321

President Donald Trump’s nominee for the Supreme Court could have a say in rulings on religious freedom, transgender bathrooms in schools, and private property rights, if he is confirmed before April 16.

One is regarding whether a Christian school in Missouri is entitled to compete for the same state dollars as nonreligious schools. The outcome could affect so-called Blaine amendments in states across the country. The second case involves property rights in Wisconsin. The third is a transgender bathroom case out of a Virginia high school, and how broadly the federal government may interpret Title IX, a federal law that bars sexual discrimination in education.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailysignal.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri; US: Virginia; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: docket; first100days; gorsuch; lawsuit; trumpscotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Thank You Harry Reid
1 posted on 04/06/2017 12:43:33 PM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: scooby321

Can’t he also rule on an emergency stay for POTUS travel ban?


2 posted on 04/06/2017 12:46:47 PM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321
One is regarding whether a Christian school in Missouri is entitled to compete for the same state dollars as nonreligious schools.

Not a fan of getting state funds. I would much prefer to see state tax deductions instead.

3 posted on 04/06/2017 12:46:58 PM PDT by Slyfox (Where's Reagan when we need him? Look in the mirror - the spirit of The Gipper lives within you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

Once he is sworn in he can rule on any case unless he recuses himself.


4 posted on 04/06/2017 12:48:00 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

Yes, yes he will!


5 posted on 04/06/2017 12:49:36 PM PDT by HombreSecreto (The life of a repo man is always intense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: scooby321
... if he is confirmed before April 16...'rats tried to put off the final vote on Gorsuch until April 24, but failed in a 55-45 vote - too bad, Schumer.....
6 posted on 04/06/2017 12:50:11 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
There is a lot of that going around lately, isn't there?
7 posted on 04/06/2017 12:50:53 PM PDT by lonevoice (diagonally parked in a parallel universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

Wasn’t Trump involved in a HUGE Public Domain Battle years ago when building one of his Casinos or something on the East Coast? Some little old granny wouldn’t budge from her home and it was eventually taken from her, anyway?

I seem to remember a helluvalot of bitchin’ about that around here.

Can anyone refresh my memory of that case? It’ll be interesting to see how a Trump SC Pick would rule on a future Public Domain case.


8 posted on 04/06/2017 12:52:23 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

I believe you are correct.

But I think it is unlikely that a Justice Gorsuch would rule on such a case based on what the President did 20 years ago when he was a private citizen.


9 posted on 04/06/2017 12:59:23 PM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

Make Caitlyn Jenner Bruce Again! Get em Gorsuch


10 posted on 04/06/2017 1:07:02 PM PDT by ErikJohnsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Trump lost out on a bid to have the lot seized in an eminent domain proceeding. So he built around her.


11 posted on 04/06/2017 1:09:06 PM PDT by Harpotoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
Yes and no. Before Kelo, Trump tried to use eminent domain on the granny in the mid-90s, but the Superior Court of New Jersey ruled in favor of the elderly woman.

Glad granny won that case, eminent domain should have a lot of restrictions placed on that "right" of the government. The Kelo v. New London decision was an abomination.
12 posted on 04/06/2017 1:10:26 PM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

Not a fan of the state being the middleman for education money.

Since it is, it should go wherever the parents of children want it to go.

Hate the filthy in-your-face anti-theists who openly try to use the power of government (by things like ... say...taking money from pm the citizenry for schools and then insisting that those be neomarxist schools) to enforce their secular agenda.

Credit where credit is due.


13 posted on 04/06/2017 1:17:18 PM PDT by MrEdd (MrEdd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

If I remember correctly I think this has to do with funds to provide a special surface (scrap tires) for a school play yard that is used by students and members of the public.


14 posted on 04/06/2017 1:17:32 PM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
Vera Coking. And Trump lost that one.


15 posted on 04/06/2017 1:18:37 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Good judgement comes from experience. And experience? Well, that comes from poor judgement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

He will be confirmed tomorrow p.m. Don’t put it past the dims to try some sleazy trick to prevent him from being sworn in. If Trump is smart, he will have Gorsuch standing by somewhere with Pence and a Bible and sware him in the second after the Senate votes to confirm.


16 posted on 04/06/2017 1:21:08 PM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321
But is he willing to overturn Roe v. Wade (and Obergefell<.i>, which follows the same logic)?
17 posted on 04/06/2017 1:27:28 PM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

This all goes back to a time when no filibusters against Supreme Court nominees would have even been considered. Only since about 2005 have there been these kinds of Senate activism regarding the “Nuclear option”. Then Minority Leader of the Senate Harry Reid was terribly concerned that the filibuster rule could be demolished, and only the collusion of the “Gang of Fourteen” prevented the removal of the 60-vote supermajority then.

But in 2013, to insure that ALL the nominees of the Obama regime got confirmed, the now Majority Leader of the Senate Harry Reid thought it a most important objective to reverse himself on the “Nuclear option”, as then the DEMOCRATS would benefit while they still held the Senate. Only nominations to the Supreme Court were still held to be sacrosanct.

But the precedent had been set, and in 2017, there is no “Gang of Fourteen” to postpone the inevitable.

Well, unless something really unforeseen goes down. Do not totally discount that happening, either.


18 posted on 04/06/2017 1:27:48 PM PDT by alloysteel (A really well polished insult sounds almost like a compliment in the ears of the recipient.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

You can’t always get what you want
You can’t always get what you want
You can’t always get what you want
But if you try sometimes you just might find
You get what you need


19 posted on 04/06/2017 1:37:09 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

A tax credit would not involve getting permission from the government about how the funds are used. And the less fingers the NEA has in my back pocket the better.


20 posted on 04/06/2017 2:04:11 PM PDT by Slyfox (Where's Reagan when we need him? Look in the mirror - the spirit of The Gipper lives within you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson