Posted on 04/06/2017 6:48:06 AM PDT by elhombrelibre
•President Trump plans military action on Syria after horrific nerve gas attack on civilians •President Trump declares that he’s changed his mind about military action •Marco Rubio says Trump’s policy emboldened Bashar al-Assad •John McCain and Lindsey Graham advocate cruise missiles and safe areas
President Trump plans military action on Syria after horrific nerve gas attack on civilians
In a very dramatic gesture, US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley at the Security Council stands and displays picture of baby killed by nerve gas and excoriates Russia's ambassador for supporting al-Assad, saying, 'How many more children have to die before Russia cares?'
In a very dramatic gesture, US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley at the Security Council stands and displays picture of baby killed by nerve gas and excoriates Russia’s ambassador for supporting al-Assad, saying, ‘How many more children have to die before Russia cares?’
President Donald Trump on Wednesday made it clear that he is planning some sort of action against Syria. Although he did not specify what kind of action, saying that he did not want to telegraph his plans, he did imply that military action is planned.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I'll try to find the posts, but someone posted an extensive analytical about the pictures that had been published.
Well, here we go again. I wish McCain would just drop.
Attacking Syria would be a huge mistake by the President.
Don’t do it. It’s a set up. They’ll drag Green Helmet Guy out from wherever he’d been holed up just to shove dead babies in front of the cameras to claim it’s Trump’s fault.
Hey Donald: It’s not our problem. It’s none of our business. It’s not worth the life of a single American serviceman.
Well, you’re gonna get the war you want.
congratulations.
K, I’m not saying I believe this or even want to, but here goes:
It makes no sense that Assad would do this because he’s winning and the political cost is just too high. Yet, evidence strongly supports air-dropped bomb(s). So, who benefits from this, that could also air-drop?
Answer: The US or Russia. Think through where this will probably lead and ask, at the end of the day, who PROFITS from what seems to be being foisted on us.
Assad would have to be the biggest imbecile to ever rule a country to do this. Huge down side and really, NO up side to that.
Even Kim Jong-un isn’t this stupid.
Our Saudi masters must be obeyed.
President Trump has made it crystal clear on more than one occasion that the enemy will be the first and the press will be the last to know of any military action by the US.
I don't trust our so-called "intelligence" community to be supplying accurate and truthful information on who actually perpetrated the attack. Too many lefty 0bamaites embedded in the spy agencies, who would like nothing better than to trip Trump.
Deploying our military now would be a “Yuge” mistake.
Obama left our military in a shambles. We need at least a year to bring the military readiness up to something that is actually useful.
Besides, IMO, this was a staged attack for propaganda purposes.
-—In a very dramatic gesture, US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley at the Security Council stands and displays picture of baby killed by nerve gas and excoriates Russia’s ambassador for supporting al-Assad, saying, ‘How many more children have to die before Russia cares?’-—
Follow-up question for Nazi Haley: How many more children have to be brutally murdered in the womb before the likes of you and your ilk care?
Charity begins at home, Ambassador.
#14
#14
Big mistake
I guess we should kill some people and kids so we can stop the killing. Makes total sense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.