Skip to comments.
Chickens Come Home to Roost: Massive Layoffs Predicted for ESPN Broadcasters (Bye, Bye Losers)
Breitbart ^
| 4-2-2017
| Robert J. Marlow
Posted on 04/02/2017 9:41:32 AM PDT by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
To: blam
They will all be re-hired sooner and in greater numbers than our unemployed scientists and engineers will be.
41
posted on
04/02/2017 1:08:22 PM PDT
by
353FMG
(AMERICA FIRST.)
To: blam
... significant cutting of on-air talent "on-air talent"? Is that what they call that bunch of blow-hards they drug out of a Connecticut bar somewhere?
42
posted on
04/02/2017 1:15:05 PM PDT
by
BwanaNdege
("The church ... is not the master or the servant of the state, but the conscience" - Luther)
To: seowulf
“And look, there’s a lot of uncertainty about who it’s gonna be and why. Remember, this is not quantum physics, so it’s not an exact equation.” Apparently, he is not familiar with the uncertainty principle.
Dang! You beat me to it.
("If you are going to 'name-drop', at least be familiar with the person/concept!")
"Paging Mr. Heisenberg, paging Mr. Heisenberg!"
43
posted on
04/02/2017 1:20:10 PM PDT
by
BwanaNdege
("The church ... is not the master or the servant of the state, but the conscience" - Luther)
To: blam
I can’t believe they actually referred to them as “talent.”
44
posted on
04/02/2017 1:31:22 PM PDT
by
LouAvul
(The most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will.)
To: LouAvul
Talent only if you think screaming “They came to play” into a camera constitutes talent.
The most annoying channels on cable.
To: buffaloguy
They should have a rule to stop more announcers then players.
46
posted on
04/02/2017 2:03:51 PM PDT
by
Big Horn
(Rebuild the GOP to a conservative party)
To: redgolum
Well, yes, that is true.
But since I have been in the “Arts” for over half a century, and look at “Entertainment” the old fashioned way...I engage in my art to ENTERTAIN people.
And make a little money at the same time. LOL! :-)
47
posted on
04/02/2017 2:54:22 PM PDT
by
left that other site
(You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
To: blam
“They’ve decided they would rather do LIBERAL politics than sports.”
That is the bottom line and it is costing them viewers.
To: blam
So the two or three women with their shortening skirts telling us all about sports isn't getting better ratings?
49
posted on
04/02/2017 3:45:57 PM PDT
by
CincyRichieRich
(Drain the swamp. Build the wall. Open the Pizzagate. I refuse to inhabit any safe space.)
To: gogeo
Nailed it. Documentaries about sports are not sports. Just like MTV made reality shows about music, but not actual music. Their "insiders" are no smarter than the average fan.
I kept cable for years only due to sports. I cut the cord and tuned out ESPN when they started adding social commentary and announcers advocated liberal politics. For me sports were an escape for a few hours. When they started infusion politics, they lost the dynamic. I miss sports, but not enough to buy cable, or ala carte ESPN. They worked hard to lose me as a customer.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson