Posted on 04/02/2017 7:24:07 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
Sunday on CNNs State of the Union, House Intelligence Committee ranking Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said it is way premature to conclude that members of President Donald Trumps campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 presidential election.
I dont think we can say anything definitively at this point, Schiff said. We are still at the very early stages of the investigation.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Translation: This is a complete hoax invented by us.
There go his invitations to the cool parties...
“We can’t say anything definitive” makes it SOUND like he has something in the works, that he’s building a case, and that he just needs more time. But he’s really saying that he has nothing.
Helen Farkas happened.
Early stages? This Russian bulls*** has been going on for months you worthless, lying piece of Leftist garbage.
What do you call a lawyer who comes in bottom of the class at law school?
Judge
A conspiracy so vast...
Recall that the Left always accuses normal Americans of what they are in fact themselves doing. Now recall the odd question in the debates about whether or not Trump would promise to accept the legitimacy of the election, and the crazed, over-the-top hysteria when he would not answer “unreservedly yes”.
They’ve been working on the “resistance” for a year now. Unless and until we start rounding them up and prosecuting them for seditious conspiracy, this will go on and on.
Maybe a reaction to seeing Trump’s evidence?
Hahah. Theyve got nuttin.
*************************************
Looks like it might be the exact opposite (we’ve got a “lot”) for the Trump side of things .... if you haven’t seen this article, it’s a great read - very explanatory.
Obama spying looks even worse than Trump claimed
http://www.wnd.com/2017/03/obama-spying-looks-even-worse-than-trump-claimed/
FR thread for article:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3540091/posts
Sorry, Schiff, your 15 minutes of fame are over. Please take a seat next to Senator Franken.
The media never lets the facts get in the way of a story.
Adam Schiff = a pencil-necked Mike Nifong
Of course, they can’t tell us what’s there so that the people can decide. Classified, dontcha know. So, we’re stuck on whatever they tell us, while those same liars leak to the friendly media what they want to be known for agit prop.
Aw, come on, Schiff. Why don't you just come out and admit that the only purpose of this "investigation" is to give Hillary cover for her blatant profiteering in collusion with Russia when she was at the State Department?
We know that Hillary started inexplicably talking about Trump and Russia during her campaign. It was obvious to any thinking person that she was accusing the Conservative of doing what she did--just like every liberal does to deflect attention from their misdeeds. Obama had already ordered an investigation of Trump on her behalf and found nothing, a fact which was published quietly in October and never picked up by the MSM. I think the calculus with that investigation was that they would find something with which to smear Trump right before the election and be able to erode his support enough to make him lose. It didn't work--the investigation was a nothing burger, and Trump won handily. So now the whole thing is picked up again, still with no evidence, because the Dems just can't handle the fact that the American people rejected them.
Maybe he's reached a point where it is "put up or shut up"?
Schiff looks like David Byrne of the Talking Heads in his big suit
I dont think we can say anything definitively at this point,
But tons can be said definitively about surveillance of Trump and subsequent unmasking and leaks.
Trump knows where Russia is, unlike half the Bolshekrat base, thereby, collusion. Adam is full of Barack Schitt.
I’d like to see a Justice Dept investigation if Obama’s birthplace.
Adam Schiff says there’s “more than circumstantial evidence” of Trump-Russia collusion
Above is from last week, NOW completely different. What happened??
We cannot trust the media for accurate reporting so trust your own perception.
Based on the reactions of prominent democrats exiting the recent briefings we are not privy to, there is not only scant evidence of Trump’s wrongdoing, there is something that scares them. Their sudden sober statements and lack of bluster tells you the evidence is not what they expected or wanted - in fact, I think the sudden silence from some of the more blustery bunch points to bad news ahead for someone not named Trump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.