If I understand this issue correctly, it is not a 14th Amendment issue imo.
More specifically, patriots are reminded that Supreme Court had clarified in United States v. Cruikshank that enumerated constitutional rights protect citizens only from actions of state and federal governments, not private entities.
And since this issue concerns a private school, the school has as much right to reasonably disagree with a student over religious issues as Christian-owned businesses have the right to diplomatically refuse service to LGBT people (ahem).
Corrections, insights welcome.
>
And since this issue concerns a private school, the school has as much right to reasonably disagree with a student over religious issues as Christian-owned businesses have the right to diplomatically refuse service to LGBT people (ahem).
Corrections, insights welcome.
>
And, as a ‘public accommodation’, like the college, how well did that work out for the baker(s) that refused to do biz w/ the gays (IIRC, $$$ in ‘fines’)??
The Socialists LOVE to have it both ways, since the Right usually bends over meekly to comply and has the ‘damn’est’ time arguing\debating vs. Constitution.