RE: progress against Climate Change
So many unproven assumptions in one statement.
1) Has he proven that humans are responsible for any global change in Climate?
2) Has he proven that any change in Climate today has not similarly occurred in the past prior to the advent of fossil fuels?
3) Has he proven that anything we do today (including damaging our businesses by increasing cost and regulations ) can affect the climate at all in a significant way?
If he hasn’t shown or proven any of that, in what way has any “progress” been made? They could all be considered “regress”.
They haven’t even proven climate change is happening.
2) Has he proven that any change in Climate today has not similarly occurred in the past prior to the advent of fossil fuels?
3) Has he proven that anything we do today (including damaging our businesses by increasing cost and regulations ) can affect the climate at all in a significant way?
4) I've been very cold (as in Hypothermia) and very hot. I have done outside manual labor in 115 degree temps. Has anyone demonstrated that Cold is better that Hot?
5) The vast majority of 'greenhouse effect warming' caused by CO2 takes place below about 100 ppm. Addding additional CO2 above the present level of about 400 ppm has very little effect.
6) CO2 is Plant Food. In what way is more Plant Food bad?
"NASA's Earth Science News Team
7) AGW warriors fret about a 1.6 degree Celsius/2.88 F rise by the end of the century. How do citizens of Fairbanks Alaska survive temperatures from a minimum of -75F to a maximum of 99F?
How is anyone still left alive in Loma, MT?
(the list goes on for anyone who actually thinks this through...)