“They all just wanted to take down Assad and install Muslim Brotherhood just like they’ve tried in Egypt and Libia.....Assad said NO!”
As I’m sure you recall, ISIS arrived on the scene “out of nowhere” fully equiped and trained. Three main Middle East players wanted ISIS to take out Assad - Saudi Arabia, Israel and Turkey. The Saudis didn’t like having a Shiite leader next door who was friendly to Iran. The Saudis want to rid the area of the Shia in order to establish their Sunni Caliphate. Likewise, Israel saw Assad as a strong Arab ruler who was friendly to Iran, Israel’s number 1 perceived enemy. He had to go. For the Turks it was simply a case of taking part of the Syrian carcass and using it to keep the Kurds in check. Uncle Sam was just the go-along bitch (Lindsey, McCain etc.) doing what very powerful Lobbies were demanding.
It’s all playing the marks.....Syria was ‘marked’ for the next in line to topple the leadership after Assad refused to play in the Globalist game.....that of installing Muslim Brotherhood in Middle EAstern NAtions whose leaderships were not co-operating with the Global Plan....
The Muslim Brotherhood are the ONLY representation throughout middle eastern states and able to work with the Globalists...and which Western Governments falsely believe they can control..... However under that assumption that they can control them it’s an orchestrated effort , and understood that the Middle Eastern nations must come under the Global Umbrella.....they want the oil revenues and resources under the Global umbrella....thus Opec was created....
This isn’t about who is a good leader and who isn’t...it’s about who is going to assume leadership among the Middle East nations who will cooperate with the global agenda and who isn’t cooperating.....
death and destruction be damned....”the end justifies the means”....
....and btw..Israel was not at all for toppling Assad....unfortunately the alliance with the USA put them in position to assist if asked no matter how reluctantly....further...Israel had a right to keep the Syrian battle off their border.....
The Shia Sunni tit for tat is just a matter of how the Global leaders use that division of Islam as they are all to familiar with what that is about sufficient to play both sides.......and that depends on how much wool they think they can pull over the middle east leaders eyes.
There’s an old saying about playing fire....and we’re certainly been setting the world up for those flames.
Like I wrote above, I’m not convinced Israel wanted Assad removed. I don’t see how they benefit from it. Perhaps I am wrong, or perhaps they tried to play both sides against the middle.
Of note, Israel and Russian ties has warmed up a bit over Obama’s term. Also of note, the Israeli natural gas find and the pipeline they are building into Europe is going to put a dent into Russian’s near monopoly in supplying gas to Europe. Anyway, in my opinion Israel wants stability over chaos and while no doubt Syria and Iran supply Hezbullah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza, those kinds of militias do not exist in Syria and attacks do not come from Syria because unlike Hamas and Hezbullah Assad does have things to lose. So he goes along with the proxy war, leaving Israel no pretext to attack Syria. But if he is removed, then a 3rd wild front could be opened and I don’t see Israel gaining a thing from that.