Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump requests — and receives — this infrastructure list from builders union
The Fort Worth Star-Telegram ^ | March 27, 2017 | Lindsay Wise and Stuart Leavenworth, McClatchy Washington Bureau

Posted on 03/27/2017 3:07:27 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: DoodleDawg

If you think about it, these jobs are something to benefit the nation, our collective property.

I would like to see people on welfare get first shot at these jobs.

We are spending half a trillion dollars on welfare each year.

If these jobs lasted three years, the reduction in welfare outlays could make serious impact on the outlays for the infrastructure rebuild.

If we could reduce welfare by $333 billion per year, that pays for one trillion in infrastructure costs over three years.

The outlay would be the same, but our infrastructure would be restored for no additional cost.


41 posted on 03/28/2017 3:54:25 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

So you would take welfare recipients, move them to the middle of the country, pay them $306 a week, and call that a good job?


42 posted on 03/28/2017 4:12:19 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Where do you all get the idea that this is a government project? This isn’t the WPA. The government is not building the pipeline, private industry is. The Treasury is not footing the bill, private industry is. So why do you want to force them to hire people just to get them off the welfare roles? Is that the quid pro quo for this?


43 posted on 03/28/2017 4:14:32 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

This is about people doing nothing and getting welfare. Here they would be doing something for the money.

I referenced these jobs as entry level type jobs.

Near the job sites would be bunk rooms for the workers, and there would have to be food services and restrooms.

The goal was not to creat good jobs. The goal was to get our infrastructure rebuilt with as little negative impact on the nation as possible.

It wouldn’t be the type of job to support a mortgage. It would be the type of job to reduce our outlays for welfare, something that has been given for nothing in return.


44 posted on 03/28/2017 9:37:34 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

I did not address the pipeline.


45 posted on 03/28/2017 9:40:55 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The Wall should be the infrastructure program. Build the entire Wall in under two years. That should make the unions happy. The result would be a twofer: economic stimulus plus get the Wall built fast.


46 posted on 03/28/2017 9:42:27 AM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson