Posted on 03/23/2017 8:47:51 AM PDT by bobsunshine
Before I get to the meat of this post, we need to revisit a little history. The cyber security firm hired to inspect the DNC hack and determine who was responsible is a firm called Crowdstrike. Its conclusion that Russia was responsible was released last year, but several people began to call its analysis into question upon further inspection.
Jeffrey Carr was one of the most prominent cynics, and as he noted in his December post, FBI/DHS Joint Analysis Report: A Fatally Flawed Effort:
(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...
Faked Hacking?
Faked Hacking morphed into the 24/7 spewing of the Russians hacked and stole the election for the evil Trump.
Without Fake Hacking and fake news about Trump, ABCNNBCBS, WSJ, NY/LA Slimes, and Compost would have to close their doors.
Question: Why wouldn’t the DNC allow the FBI to examine the ‘hacked’ server?
Answer: Because the server was never hacked.
Or it contained massive evidence of wrongdoing...
Oh, the DNC was hacked all right. It was hacked by the trio of muslim brothers hired by DWS who stole national security data from a bunch of democrats’ computers. And we’re paid $160K to do it. DWS still has at least one of them in her employ. She’s quite puzzled as to why this is a problem.
If the DNC was shown not to have been hacked then someone with access would have had to have released info to Wikileaks and people would have started to check to see who was murdered about that time. Oh dear then the unsolved murder of Seth Rich would no longer be unsolved. That would all look so unseemly so it had to be stopped. FBI cooperated nicely on the lie and the coverup.
Even more surreal now to listen to Comey live on the radio saying he was using the Crowdstrike ramblings as evidence. Even after a congressman pointed out the inadmissability of hearsay (in another context). The crowdstrike blog post is all the evidence the FBI needs apparantly.
Oh My .. what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.
And then, we have a player in the Hillary campaign, who clicks on a “phishing” link and exposes all the conversations with Hillary. Brilliant.
With bright bulbs like this .. HOW THE HELL DO THE DEMOCRATS EVER WIN ... THEY CHEAT !!!!!
The democRats lie and cheat at every level from voting to blatant PR lies for their side posing as news.
Even their DNC giving debate questions to Illiarily before the debate, and they still lost.
Well .. I’m hoping some of the Dems are finally seeing they need to make a change in leadership (getting rid of Obama and Hillary would be a good start) .. somewhat like what the GOP did .. even though there are many elites still hanging on, the GOP is much better off.
Those wily Russians. They hacked everything and changed my vote from Trump to... Trump... I guess.
And they hacked my brain and made me hate Hillary because... you know... she’s a woman. GRRRRRRR HILLARY, BEING FEMALE AND STUFF!!! RAWRRRRR!!
Finally, to top it all off, they hacked John Podesta’s brain and made him think up the password “p@ssw0rd”. That made it SOOO much easier for them to look at his e-mail.
Russians. First they beat Hitler, then they put the next Hitler in charge of America! DAMN YOU RUSSIANS!!
The DNC refused to allow the government to investigate. The government relied on the claims of the DNC’s investigator, Crowdstrike Inc.
Crowdstrike’s owner, Alperovitch, claims that Russia hacked the DNC email system. Alperovitch claims malware used to breach the DNC email system was previously used by Russia to attack Ukrainian troops. This forms the basis of his claim that Russia hacked the DNC.
Alperovitch’s claim that Russia used this software to attack Ukrainian troops is partly based on the claims of a Russian blogger. The Russian blogger claims that Ukrainian military units were targeted via malware inserted onto Ukrainian tablet computers, the malware provided to Russia the location of Ukrainian troops, resulting in destruction of Ukrainian howitzers. To support the claim the blogger cites a 2016 International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) report of a sharp reduction of Ukrainian D-30 howitzers between 2013 and 2015.
//
One of the IISS researchers who produced the data said that while the think tank had dramatically lowered its estimates of Ukrainian artillery assets and howitzers in 2013, it did so as part of a “reassessment” and reallocation of units to airborne forces.
“No, we have never attributed this reduction to combat losses,” the IISS researcher said, explaining that most of the reallocation occurred prior to the two-year period that CrowdStrike cites in its report.
“The vast majority of the reduction actually occurs ... before Crimea/Donbass,” he added, referring to the 2014 Russian invasion of Ukraine.
http://www.voanews.com/a/crowdstrike-comey-russia-hack-dnc-clinton-trump/3776067.html
//
The malware has been available for years prior to the DNC breach.
//
Alperovitch told the PBS NewsHour: “And when you think about, well, who would be interested in targeting Ukraine artillerymen in eastern Ukraine? Who has interest in hacking the Democratic Party? [The] Russia government comes to mind
http://www.voanews.com/a/crowdstrike-comey-russia-hack-dnc-clinton-trump/3776067.html
Why does Alperovitch think Russia has an interest in hacking the Democrat Party? What are Alperovitch’s biases?
Our knowledge of the rats’s crimes and malfeance against us grows each day.
Supporting research in this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3532194/posts?q=1&;page=21
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.