Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PROSECUTE THE SANCTUARY SECESSIONISTS
Frontpage Mag ^ | March 20, 2017 | David Horowitz

Posted on 03/20/2017 6:47:47 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo

There are now 500 sanctuary cities in the United States, virtually all Democratic, which are pledged not to cooperate with the Department of Homeland Security in its efforts to secure our borders, identify terrorists, and deport criminal aliens. California has taken the lead in this pernicious movement and is about to become the first sanctuary state. Moreover, every public California institution of higher learning has declared itself a “sanctuary campus” including the University of California whose president Janet Napolitano is a former Obama appointee to head the Department of Homeland Security itself. This is the most massive movement of sedition since the Civil War and is the centerpiece of the so-called “resistance” – itself a form of sedition in a democracy - that Democrats have mobilized against the Trump administration.

With its proposed budget, the Trump administration has taken the first step in dealing with this internal threat to American security by withdrawing federal funding for criminal municipalities and counties which are in open defiance of federal law. De-funding is a good first step but is not enough to counter-act the serious threat that the sanctuary movement poses to our nation’s security in the midst of the global war that Islamists have declared on us. What is needed is the prosecution of the criminal officials leading this movement. The Department of Justice needs to investigate and indict the mayors of these municipalities and the derelict presidents and chancellors of sanctuary campuses.

This week to support such an effort, the Freedom Center launched a campaign targeting 11 California schools in the UC and Cal State system. We are putting up “WANTED” posters featuring UC president Janet Napolitano and Cal State University Chancellor Timothy White. The posters call for them to be prosecuted for sedition and their campuses defunded. The posters are part of what will be a national campaign targeting university administrators who, in an effort to appease radical students and faculty, flagrantly break federal law and obstruct federal officials from protecting American citizens.

The Freedom Center’s “No Sanctuary Campuses” campaign began last month at UC Berkeley when Milo Yiannopolous was scheduled to launch our campaign but was prevented from speaking by leftwing fascists whose riot caused over $100,000 in property damage and resulted in serious injuries for several bystanders, while the Berkeley police looked on and did nothing.

Sanctuary campuses are not only part of a radical attack on America’s social, political, and educational establishment but a dagger aimed at the rule of law and the nation’s safety. The illegal immigrant’s first act on American soil is to break the most fundamental of U.S. laws. The administrators who make their schools sanctuaries are making that lawlessness part of the character and identity of our most important intellectual institutions. The Freedom Center’s campaign will move from California to the rest of the U.S, and hopefully inspire others to do the same. It will call out by name administrators such as Napolitano and White who defy federal immigration law and hopefully will galvanize trustees, alumni and attorneys general to resist this assault on our country and take action against these administrators. It will also make the case against sanctuary campuses to the American public whose taxes underwrite the UC and Cal State University systems and other schools across the country.

The “sanctuary movement” began as a concerted effort by left-wing administrations in major American cities to undermine the Patriot Act and make it more difficult for the Department of Homeland Security to ferret out terrorists and criminal aliens, and deport them. This movement has already led to murders and other crimes committed by illegal aliens to whom sanctuary cities give immunity and protection. But since the election of a president determined to rectify this untenable situation the left has doubled down and is now working to spread this seditious movement from our cities to our colleges and universities, and, in California, to make the entire state a sanctuary for foreign criminals.

The time has come for patriotic Americans to form their own resistance to the growing threat from within, orchestrated by the political left. The president is under incredible, unprecedented attack for his efforts to defend the republic from these threats. He needs help in the form of local movements to remove from office seditious officials running our cities and universities, who have been able to do so with no consequences for them until now. The time has come to make America secure again.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 03/20/2017 6:47:47 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
What is needed is the prosecution of the criminal officials leading this movement.

I've been saying this for a while. Mayors, police chiefs, university presidents, the university board members, city council members...

Sedition? Is that what it is? These people swore an oath, at last the paid public figure ones did.

At the very least they should be booted from their positions.

A police chief that refuses to enforce the laws of our nation? What the heck?

This is unacceptable!

2 posted on 03/20/2017 6:56:44 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Why do so many Democrat women like like someone who just crawled out of the green lagoon?


3 posted on 03/20/2017 6:57:58 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

No argument here. These are a clear and present danger to our republic.


4 posted on 03/20/2017 6:58:09 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Je Suis Pepe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Make an example of Kevin De Leon( The De is not part of his legal name, he set to to sound more ethnic) the president of the CA state senate who admits his family is illegal. And clean out the vipers nest in LA and the other cities will fall in line.


5 posted on 03/20/2017 7:02:14 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

It is a nice story but this scenario is a no go for Republicans. They have zero spine for lawful actions. A faitytale like this does nothing but appeal to the lunitic right wing fringe.


6 posted on 03/20/2017 7:04:53 PM PDT by WilliamRobert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Is Jeff Sessions still alive?


7 posted on 03/20/2017 7:06:20 PM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

It is OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!! Where is jeff sessions? RECUSING?? OMG!!


8 posted on 03/20/2017 7:07:08 PM PDT by WENDLE (DEFEAT RINOCARI . NO RINOCARE!! TRUMP WAKE UP!! Fire SESSIONS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

When a local LEO refuses to hold an illegal for ICE they are aiding abetting criminals. They are criminals themselves.


9 posted on 03/20/2017 7:09:14 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
California is a de facto State In Rebellion and is openly talking of making it official. That State hates America and is doing its best to destroy it.
10 posted on 03/20/2017 7:18:40 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

US could save a lot of money by not sending any to California. Send the illegals to San Francisco since they are so beloved there.


11 posted on 03/20/2017 7:21:14 PM PDT by Rainier1789 (My Constitution has a 2nd and 10th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

I also think that some great object lessons will put an end to this sort of thing quickly.

I might go for a Sanctuary City outside of California to get the kinks worked out, then blanket the state of California with major indictments, perhaps even organized crime.

These people are networking to facilitate this stuff. They know the law better than anyone else. It’s a conspiracy.


12 posted on 03/20/2017 7:22:57 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

The best way to handle this is to get citizens in those so called “sanctuary” localities demand to know what its costing them.


13 posted on 03/20/2017 7:23:22 PM PDT by mosesdapoet (My best insights get lost in FR's because of meaningless venting no one reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

“De-funding is a good first step...”

I think it’s going to do a LOT! As soon as the tap of Taxpayer Dollars is turned off, they’re going to sing a different tune.


14 posted on 03/20/2017 7:23:33 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

The elected officials who swore to uphold the law are obviously only upholding laws THEY agree with. No, not good enough. Slap those arrogant libtard IDIOTS who are jeopardizing the safety of U.S. citizens into jail for long sentences. Fine them as well. Cut off federal funding to those cities. When services start drying up, maybe the idiot residents of those traitorous cities will come to heel. Either we are the UNITED States of America or a bunch of free-for-all duchies.


15 posted on 03/20/2017 7:26:19 PM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Let’s roll!


16 posted on 03/20/2017 7:27:08 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC

Works for me. I’m a hard nose on it too.

This libtard mentality needs to be stuffed down their throats.


17 posted on 03/20/2017 7:28:32 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo; All

Federal Immigration and Nationality Act
Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii)

“Any person who . . . encourages or induces an alien to . . . reside . . . knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such . . . residence is . . . in violation of law, shall be punished as provided . . . for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs . . . fined under title 18 . . . imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.”

Section 274 felonies under the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, INA 274A(a)(1)(A):

A person (including a group of persons, business, organization, or local government) commits a federal felony when she or he:

• assists an alien s/he should reasonably know is illegally in the U.S. or who lacks employment authorization, by transporting, sheltering, or assisting him or her to obtain employment, or

• encourages that alien to remain in the U.S. by referring him or her to an employer or by acting as employer or agent for an employer in any way, or

•knowingly assists illegal aliens due to personal convictions.

Penalties upon conviction include criminal fines, imprisonment, and forfeiture of vehicles and real property used to commit the crime. Anyone employing or contracting with an illegal alien without verifying his or her work authorization status is guilty of a misdemeanor. Aliens and employers violating immigration laws are subject to arrest, detention, and seizure of their vehicles or property. In addition, individuals or entities who engage in racketeering enterprises that commit (or conspire to commit) immigration-related felonies are subject to private civil suits for treble damages and injunctive relief.

Recruitment and Employment of Illegal Aliens

It is unlawful to hire an alien, to recruit an alien, or to refer an alien for a fee, knowing the alien is unauthorized to work in the United States. It is equally unlawful to continue to employ an alien knowing that the alien is unauthorized to work. Employers may give preference in recruitment and hiring to a U.S. citizen over an alien with work authorization only where the U.S. citizen is equally or better qualified. It is unlawful to hire an individual for employment in the United States without complying with employment eligibility verification requirements. Requirements include examination of identity documents and completion of Form I-9 for every employee hired. Employers must retain all I-9s, and, with three days’ advance notice, the forms must be made available for inspection. Employment includes any service or labor performed for any type of remuneration within the United States, with the exception of sporadic domestic service by an individual in a private home. Day laborers or other casual workers engaged in any compensated activity (with the above exception) are employees for purposes of immigration law. An employer includes an agent or anyone acting directly or indirectly in the interest of the employer. For purposes of verfication of authorization to work, employer also means an independent contractor, or a contractor other than the person using the alien labor. The use of temporary or short-term contracts cannot be used to circumvent the employment authorization verification requirements. If employment is to be for less than the usual three days allowed for completing the I-9 Form requirement, the form must be completed immediately at the time of hire.

An employer has constructive knowledge that an employee is an illegal unauthorized worker if a reasonable person would infer it from the facts. Constructive knowledge constituting a violation of federal law has been found where (1) the I-9 employment eligibility form has not been properly completed, including supporting documentation, (2) the employer has learned from other individuals, media reports, or any source of information available to the employer that the alien is unauthorized to work, or (3) the employer acts with reckless disregard for the legal consequences of permitting a third party to provide or introduce an illegal alien into the employer’s work force. Knowledge cannot be inferred solely on the basis of an individual’s accent or foreign appearance.

Actual specific knowledge is not required. For example, a newspaper article stating that ballrooms depend on an illegal alien work force of dance hostesses was held by the courts to be a reasonable ground for suspicion that unlawful conduct had occurred.

IT IS ILLEGAL FOR NONPROFIT OR RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS to knowingly assist an employer to violate employment sanctions, REGARDLESS OF CLAIMS THAT THEIR CONVICTIONS REQUIRE THEM TO ASSIST ALIENS. Harboring or aiding illegal aliens is not protected by the First Amendment. It is a felony to establish a commercial enterprise for the purpose of evading any provision of federal immigration law. Violators may be fined or imprisoned for up to five years.

Encouraging and Harboring Illegal Aliens

It is a violation of law for any person to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection in any place, including any building or means of transportation, any alien who is in the United States in violation of law. HARBORING MEANS ANY CONDUCT THAT TENDS TO SUBSTANTIALLY FACILITATE AN ALIEN TO REMAIN IN THE U.S. ILLEGALLY. The sheltering need not be clandestine, and harboring covers aliens arrested outdoors, as well as in a building. This provision includes harboring an alien who entered the U.S. legally but has since lost his legal status.

An employer can be convicted of the felony of harboring illegal aliens who are his employees if he takes actions in reckless disregard of their illegal status, such as ordering them to obtain false documents, altering records, obstructing INS inspections, or taking other actions that facilitate the alien’s illegal employment. Any person who within any 12-month period hires ten or more individuals with actual knowledge that they are illegal aliens or unauthorized workers is guilty of felony harboring. It is also a felony to encourage or induce an alien to come to or reside in the U.S. knowing or recklessly disregarding the fact that the alien’s entry or residence is in violation of the law. This crime applies to any person, rather than just employers of illegal aliens. Courts have ruled that “encouraging” includes counseling illegal aliens to continue working in the U.S. or assisting them to complete applications with false statements or obvious errors. The fact that the alien is a refugee fleeing persecution is not a defense to this felony, since U.S. law and the UN Protocol on Refugees both require that a refugee must report to immigration authorities without delay upon entry to the U.S.

The penalty for felony harboring is a fine and imprisonment for up to five years. The penalty for felony alien smuggling is a fine and up to ten years’ imprisonment. Where the crime causes serious bodily injury or places the life of any person in jeopardy, the penalty is a fine and up to twenty years’ imprisonment. If the criminal smuggling or harboring results in the death of any person, the penalty can include life imprisonment. Convictions for aiding, abetting, or conspiracy to commit alien smuggling or harboring, carry the same penalties. Courts can impose consecutive prison sentences for each alien smuggled or harbored. A court may order a convicted smuggler to pay restitution if the alien smuggled qualifies as a victim under the Victim and Witness Protection Act. Conspiracy to commit crimes of sheltering, harboring, or employing illegal aliens is a separate federal offense punishable by a fine of up to $10,000 or five years’ imprisonment.

Enforcement

A person or entity having knowledge of a violation or potential violation of employer sanctions provisions may submit a signed written complaint to the INS office with jurisdiction over the business or residence of the potential violator, whether an employer, employee, or agent. The complaint must include the names and addresses of both the complainant and the violator, and detailed factual allegations, including date, time, and place of the potential violation, and the specific conduct alleged to be a violation of employer sanctions. By regulation, the INS will only investigate third-party complaints that have a reasonable probability of validity. Designated INS officers and employees, and all other officers whose duty it is to enforce criminal laws, may make an arrest for violation of smuggling or harboring illegal aliens.

State and local law enforcement officials have the general power to investigate and arrest violators of federal immigration statutes without prior INS knowledge or approval, as long as they are authorized to do so by state law. There is no extant federal limitation on this authority. The 1996 immigration control legislation passed by Congress was intended to encourage states and local agencies to participate in the process of enforcing federal immigration laws. Immigration officers and local law enforcement officers may detain an individual for a brief warrantless interrogation where circumstances create a reasonable suspicion that the individual is illegally present in the U.S. Specific facts constituting a reasonable suspicion include evasive, nervous, or erratic behavior; dress or speech indicating foreign citizenship; and presence in an area known to contain a concentration of illegal aliens. Hispanic appearance alone is not sufficient. Immigration officers and police must have a valid warrant or valid employer’s consent to enter workplaces or residences. Any vehicle used to transport or harbor illegal aliens, or used as a substantial part of an activity that encourages illegal aliens to come to or reside in the U.S. may be seized by an immigration officer and is subject to forfeiture. The forfeiture power covers any conveyances used within the U.S.

RICO — Citizen Recourse

Private persons and entities may initiate civil suits to obtain injunctions and treble damages against enterprises that conspire to or actually violate federal alien smuggling, harboring, or document fraud statutes, under the Racketeer-Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO). The pattern of racketeering activity is defined as commission of two or more of the listed crimes. A RICO enterprise can be any individual legal entity, or a group of individuals who are not a legal entity but are associated in fact, AND CAN INCLUDE NONPROFIT ASSOCIATIONS.

Tax Crimes

Employers who aid or abet the preparation of false tax returns by failing to pay income or Social Security taxes for illegal alien employees, or who knowingly make payments using false names or Social Security numbers, are subject to IRS criminal and civil sanctions. U.S. nationals who have suffered intentional discrimination because of citizenship or national origin by an employer with more than three employees may file a complaint within 180 days of the discriminatory act with the Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices, U.S. Department of Justice. In additon to the federal statutes summarized, state laws and local ordinances controlling fair labor practices, workers compensation, zoning, safe housing and rental property, nuisance, licensing, street vending, and solicitations by contractors may also apply to activities that involve illegal aliens.


18 posted on 03/20/2017 7:38:27 PM PDT by eyeamok (destruction of government records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamRobert
They have zero spine for lawful actions.

Hard to enforce laws when you have your hand in some one else's pocket.

19 posted on 03/20/2017 7:42:27 PM PDT by itsahoot (Must learn to resist the compunction to offer advice or help to complainers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

“Why do so many Democrat women look like someone who just crawled out of the green lagoon?”

I think working for Satan makes a person ugly as the years pass.


20 posted on 03/20/2017 7:49:29 PM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WilliamRobert
A faitytale like this does nothing but appeal to the lunitic right wing fringe.

Just who might that "lunitic right wing fringe," be?

21 posted on 03/20/2017 7:58:45 PM PDT by gogeo (When your life is based on a false premise...you are indeed insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

The Freedom Center’s “No Sanctuary Campuses” campaign began last month at UC Berkeley when Milo Yiannopolous was scheduled to launch our campaign but was prevented from speaking by leftwing fascists whose riot caused over $100,000 in property damage and resulted in serious injuries for several bystanders, while the Berkeley police looked on and did nothing.


So this is why they brought in professional anarchists...to try to stop this Freedom Center initiative?!


22 posted on 03/20/2017 7:59:25 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 (Inside Every Liberal is a Totalitarian Screaming to Get Out - D. Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WilliamRobert

faitytale like this does nothing but appeal to the lunitic right wing fringe.


Well, I guess you have a better idea?


23 posted on 03/20/2017 8:00:35 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 (Inside Every Liberal is a Totalitarian Screaming to Get Out - D. Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dsc

Either that or as a homely person they eat it up, when the Left shows an interest in them. I don’t intimate we do or should reject them, but I think the Left reads them like a rapist or a con-man reads a vulnerable person. There’s a sixth sense to it.


24 posted on 03/20/2017 8:05:15 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Freedom56v2

Wouldn’t doubt it. I have no way of knowing though.


25 posted on 03/20/2017 8:12:05 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

There’s a sixth sense to it.
________________

You’re right. It has little to do w/looks and a lot to do with being incapable of logic.

As students, my husband and I were each *scouted* and in two different venues separated by 8 years,we were both dismissed. Better to say, we rejected them, even though we considered ourselves *liberal* until Reagan. But they could tell we weren’t going to be led, even before we knew it for sure ourselves.


26 posted on 03/20/2017 8:25:53 PM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal

Glad you saw it, because I think they really twist people.

Some people are critical thinkers in that they ask questions and reason things. You don’t have to tell a person like this everything. They’ll run stuff by you to see what you think, and probably others too. They pretty much know intuitively what truth is, aren’t totally immune to being wrong, but won’t be bullied. If someone else makes sense, they’ll listen and apply as necessary.

Then you get the wide eyed person that goes on cruise control through life, letting other tell them what to think. These folks are dangerous, susceptible to being ruined by people who will manipulate them, and capable of just about anything if led right.

Funny thing is, these folks think we’re the ones being led around. They try to peddle that to anyone they can, and it’s their own group that buys into it.

I think the leaders of the Left aren’t in this class. They know better but do it for ideology. They have no morals and will use the clueless up if given a chance.

Good luck waking the clueless up. They’ve been told anyone who says different, is just a propagandist. They won’t even listen.

I have a person that is a union member. They are sold on everything the union says. Yes, seriously.

I once mentioned to this person that the Democrats had been in control of our state legislature for the last 50 years. After tell them that, I asked if they were happy with the way things were going. They said no.

I asked, which party do you think is to blame. They told me it was the Republicans.

You know, Leftists don’t even see it. Logic is just turned off.


27 posted on 03/20/2017 9:01:33 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Indict them as accessories before the fact every time that an illegal alien harms a US citizen.


28 posted on 03/20/2017 9:08:15 PM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NTHockey

I think that if you can tie an LEO to the individual prior to them committing the felony, you could do just that. If the LEO could refer you to a directive from the top that he was following, you could take him and his superior(s) out with him.


29 posted on 03/20/2017 9:16:46 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo; All

This was brought up months ago. Where are the arrests? As usual, talk...talk. All talk, no action.


30 posted on 03/20/2017 9:18:40 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Karl Spooner; All

Sessions? Pffft. He’s another empty suit. Trump should have hired Trey Gowdy. Gowdy believes in the rule of law, and law enforce,met. Sessions should just go back to his shrimp boat in the Alabama Bayou.


31 posted on 03/20/2017 9:21:05 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

There’s a lot of truth in that, I think.

Back in the sixties, few attractive mainstream winners dropped out and joined the freaks. Of course there were some.


32 posted on 03/20/2017 11:59:05 PM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

I think it would be appropriate to declare the Sanctuary cities, universities, and States to be in Rebellion against the government of the United States and proceed appropriately. The Sanctuary movement is actually partial Secession and should be identified and treated as such.


33 posted on 03/21/2017 1:05:01 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I’d START with the judges and local government officials.


34 posted on 03/21/2017 1:50:50 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

They abound, I know. Exactly as you say. They chose popularity over personal growth and, due to the intentional & ideological language shifts, critical thinking means “criticize anyone who disagrees”. “Personal growth” means the cult or fad du jour.

The dominant left takes advantage of human herd instinct. Clever and insidious. By now, though, even most of the managerial level *leaders* are simply pawns. Could account for the shift that elected Trump...regression to the mean, and all that. Above that, the real controllers are cynical enough to have seen the need to take over a sufficient portion of the leadership of what used to be bastions of traditionalism. Best examples are the Catholic Church, Protestant clergy, Reform Jewry and the GOPe.

I see no effective means to change them.


35 posted on 03/21/2017 4:08:19 AM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

They abound, I know. Exactly as you say. They chose popularity over personal growth and, due to the intentional & ideological language shifts, critical thinking means “criticize anyone who disagrees”. “Personal growth” means the cult or fad du jour.

The dominant left takes advantage of human herd instinct. Clever and insidious. By now, though, even most of the managerial level *leaders* are simply pawns. Could account for the shift that elected Trump...regression to the mean, and all that. Above that, the real controllers are cynical enough to have seen the need to take over a sufficient portion of the leadership of what used to be bastions of traditionalism. Best examples are the Catholic Church, Protestant clergy, Reform Jewry and the GOPe.

I see no effective means to change them.


36 posted on 03/21/2017 4:08:49 AM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Can the congress pass a law that makes these Sanctuary Cities and their leaders civilly liable for any crimes committed by the illegals they protect? If they can, that seems like an effective weapon against these sanctuary cities.


37 posted on 03/21/2017 4:18:45 AM PDT by Londo Molari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

I wouldn’t be unhappy with that choice at all.


38 posted on 03/21/2017 9:15:29 AM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dsc

Yes, there were some. I remember a few.

I appreciate the note of agreement.


39 posted on 03/21/2017 10:08:41 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: NTHockey

Where judges can be shown to have breached a law or code, I agree.

That broad that helped the illegal alien escape through her private entrance should have been arrested and prosecuted to the full extent of the law.


40 posted on 03/21/2017 10:11:08 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal

The World Council of Churches (I believe I have that title right), has been a very problematic entity. It’s my suspicion that many churches have been led astray by their craven deceptions.

Yes we have Leftists ensconced in our institutions.

Isn’t it interesting that the McCarthy era is resoundingly trashed today, and yet what he and they were trying to prevent is now upon us. It’s undeniable that Leftist ideology flourished, and it’s inception was the Communist party emanating from Soviet Russia.

We address is as Leftist today, but it’s the Communist Party principles put into action.


41 posted on 03/21/2017 10:16:17 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

It is what brought us Trump. The fury with which he has been attacked validates our choice.

A trope of the establishment from the past 8-10 years has been that the country is *ungovernable*. They know that without a boot on our throats, they cannot herd a majority as they wish. The heavier their stomp, the more passionate the response toward freedom.

Isn’t it telling that they have now tried to co-opt the term Resistance, as though _they_ have been oppressed by _us_? And the form of their _resistance_ is to assault, scream, yell, marginalize, demean and destroy everyone who actually has resisted?

So many are so aware of their methods, they have become black, bitter jokes. After trying to censor You Tube into PC compliance, for example, I read last week how SJWs and the other snowflakes are leaving YT because “it has been taken over by the alt-right.” (sic) Then, yesterday, I came across another bitter screed of alphabet-soup gender/sexual preferences bitching that they are marginalized on YT (or something....I admit I didn’t read carefully).

They marched through the institutions, leaving behind wastelands and they are furious that we are planting gardens in the ashes. They would kill us all, if they could. If the coercion fails, they will likely try. More accurately: they are trying now.

They will fail.


42 posted on 03/21/2017 11:54:47 AM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal

I agree with your comments and observations.

That being the case, I don’t have anything to add.

It is what it is, and what you described is obviously taking place,

I agree with your conclusion too.

I will however point out, that if God is to return, something like this Leftist effort going on now, will have to take place at some point. And then it will be successful absent His intervention.


43 posted on 03/21/2017 12:01:57 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson