Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrat Slams Neil Gorsuch: “He Believes the Intentional Taking of Human Life is Always Wrong”
Life News ^ | March 20, 2017 | STEVEN ERTELT

Posted on 03/20/2017 2:22:21 PM PDT by NYer

During the hearing today in the Senate Judiciary Committee over Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch, pro-abortion Democrat Dianne Feinstein slammed the potential High Court pick.

Feinstein drew on the issue of abortion for her criticism — saying that she probably will oppose Gorsuch because he believes “the intentional taking of a human life by private persons is always wrong.”

“President Trump repeatedly promised that his judicial nominees would be pro-life, and automatically overturn Roe v. Wade,” she said. “Judge Gorsuch has not had occasion to rule directly on a case involving Roe. However, his writings do raise questions. Specifically, he wrote that he believes there are no exceptions to the principle that ‘the intentional taking of a human life by private persons is always wrong.’ This language has been interpreted by both pro-life and pro-choice organizations to mean he would overturn Roe.”

“President Trump repeatedly promised to appoint someone in the mold of Justice Scalia and said that the nomination of Judge Gorsuch illustrates he’s a man of his word,” said Feinstein. “The Supreme Court has the final say on whether a woman will continue to have control over her own body or whether decisions about her healthcare will be determined by politicians and the government.”

Feinstein then described a 21-week abortion as the kind of abortion at stake if Gorsuch’s nomination is confirmed.

Brian Burch of CatholicVote responded to the attacks.

“Already, Democratic Senators are on the attack. They understand the historic nature of this nomination. Left-wing groups have used the courts and reckless judicial decisions to impose their agenda on the people. But that could all end soon,” he said. “Judge Gorsuch has pledged to obey the Constitution and to respect the limited role of judges. Judges are not policy makers. Judges are not politicians. And when the Supreme Court restrains itself, the Left typically loses.”

“Today, Senators presented their opening statements. Tomorrow, the real fireworks begin with 30-minute Q & A exchanges between Judge Gorsuch and individual Senators on the Judiciary Committee — for 10 hours not counting breaks,” he added.

SIGN THE PETITION! Vote to Confirm Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch

President Donald Trump nominated the federal appeals Court Judge with strong support from pro-life organizations that point to his track record as supporting religious freedom for pro-life organizations refusing to be forced to pay for abortions. They also noted his opposition to assisted suicide and his support for a state fighting to defund Planned Parenthood abortion business.

The Planned Parenthood abortion business was also quick toblast Judge Gorsuch as well.

The abortion giant slammed Gorsuch for supporting Hobby Lobby and the Little Sisters of the Poor in their bids to not be forced to pay for abortion-causing drugs in their employee health care plans.

“Gorsuch has also worked to undermine access to essential health care — ruling that bosses should be able to deny women birth control coverage. His record shows a disturbing willingness to let ideology overrule his constitutional duty to uphold and respect clearly established precedent protecting our fundamental liberties, including Roe v. Wade and Whole Woman’s Health,” Planned Parenthood said.

The 49-year-old Judge Gorsuch, if confirmed, would replace pro-life Justice Antonin Scalia – who supporting overturning Roe v. Wade and allowing states to once again provide legal protection for unborn children.

Justice Gorsuch is currently a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, which includes the districts of Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming, as well as the Eastern, Northern and Western districts of Oklahoma. He has served as a federal judge since August 2006 and was appointed by President George W. Bush and confirmed unanimously by the Senate.

The pro-life legal scholars who know him best say he is a strong originalist, believing that the Constitution should only be interpreted as the Founding Fathers intended. That would him squarely in the legal camp of Justice Scalia.

One of the biggest problems pro-life advocates have with the Supreme Court is that it invented a so-called right to abortion in Roe v. Wade. But Gorsuch’s writings indicate he opposes that kind of thinking. In a 2005 National Review article, Gorsuch wrote that  liberals rely on the courts too much to made social policy.

This overweening addiction to the courtroom as the place to debate social policy is bad for the country and bad for the judiciary. In the legislative arena, especially when the country is closely divided, compromises tend to be the rule the day. But when judges rule this or that policy unconstitutional, there’s little room for compromise: One side must win, the other must lose. In constitutional litigation, too, experiments and pilot programs–real-world laboratories in which ideas can be assessed on the results they produce–are not possible. Ideas are tested only in the abstract world of legal briefs and lawyers arguments. As a society, we lose the benefit of the give-and-take of the political process and the flexibility of social experimentation that only the elected branches can provide.

He said liberal activists rely on the judicial system “as the primary means of effecting their social agenda on everything from gay marriage to assisted suicide to the use of vouchers for private-school education.”

On direct pro-life matters, Gorsuch sided with the state of Utah in its attempt to defund the Planned Parenthood abortion business.

Gorsuch sided with pro-life Utah Governor Gary Herbert’s effort to defund Planned Parenthood. After his decision, the 10th Circuit Court decided against re-hearing Planned Parenthood v. Gary Herbert, after the court previously ordered Utah to fund Planned Parenthood. Gorsch dissented in the case and wrote:

Respectfully, this case warrants rehearing. As it stands, the panel opinion leaves litigants in preliminary injunction disputes reason to worry that this court will sometimes deny deference to district court factual findings; relax the burden of proof by favoring attenuated causal claims our precedent disfavors; and invoke arguments for reversal untested by the parties, unsupported by the record, and inconsistent with principles of comity. Preliminary injunction disputes like this one recur regularly and ensuring certainty in the rules governing them, and demonstrating that we will apply those rules consistently to all matters that come before us, is of exceptional importance to the law, litigants, lower courts, and future panels alike. I respectfully dissent.

As National Review pro-life legal scholar Ed Whelan notes:

I’d like to take note of his remarkable failure to acknowledge, much less credit Gorsuch for, Gorsuch’s powerful dissent (see pp. 16-27 here) one month ago from the Tenth Circuit’s denial of rehearing en banc in Planned Parenthood Association of Utah v. Herbert. As the faithful reader will recall from these posts of mine, in the aftermath of the Center for Medical Progress’s release of videos depicting various Planned Parenthood affiliates’ ugly involvement in harvesting body parts, Utah governor Gary Herbert directed state agencies “to cease acting as an intermediary for pass-through federal funds” to Planned Parenthood’s Utah affiliate. But after the district court denied Planned Parenthood’s request for a preliminary injunction against Herbert’s directive, a divided panel, on very weak reasoning, ruled that Planned Parenthood was entitled to a preliminary injunction. Gorsuch’s dissent dismantles the panel majority’s reasoning.

Would a Supreme Court Justice Gorsuch be inclined to overturn the decades-old decision fostering abortion on demand? His record suggests he is open to doing so.

As one pro-life legal scholar notes:

In the panel ruling in Games-Perez, Gorsuch did indeed regard himself as bound to abide by controlling circuit precedent, just as nearly every circuit judge not named Stephen Reinhardt also does. But Gorsuch didn’t stop there. In a 20-page opinion, he urged the en banc Tenth Circuit to reconsider and overrule the wrong precedent.

Gorsuch also has made pro-life comments about abortion and strongly opposes assisted suicide. He has written a book, The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia, which (as Princeton University Press puts it) “builds a nuanced, novel, and powerful moral and legal argument against legalization [of assisted suicide and euthanasia], one based on a principle that, surprisingly, has largely been overlooked in the debate—the idea that human life is intrinsically valuable and that intentional killing is always wrong.”

Meanwhile, as National Review reports, “Gorsuch wrote a powerful dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc in a case involving funding of Planned Parenthood.” NR indicates Gorsuch has written “human life is fundamentally and inherently valuable, and that the intentional taking of human life by private persons is always wrong.”

Democrats have already promised to filibuster any Supreme Court nominee.

Sen. Jeff Merkle, a pro-abortion Oregon Democrat, said in an interview on Monday morning that he will filibuster any pick other than pro-abortion Judge Merrick garland — who pro-abortion president Barack Obama named to replace pro-life Justice Antonin Scalia.

“This is a stolen seat. This is the first time a Senate majority has stolen a seat,” Merkley said in an interview. “We will use every lever in our power to stop this.”

Gorsuch is 49 years old. He and his wife, Louise, have two daughters and live in Boulder, Colorado.

dianefeinstein2

 


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: abortion; democrats; gorsuch; hag; prolife; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-69 next last

1 posted on 03/20/2017 2:22:21 PM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NYer

So much for the notion of never using issues to decide fitness for SCOTUS.


2 posted on 03/20/2017 2:23:56 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Other than judicial execution, when is the intentional taking of a human life acceptable?

Self-defense exceptions are forced on the defender, they are not intentional acts.


3 posted on 03/20/2017 2:26:12 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I’ll bet Feinstein is one of those dizzy broads who is “fighting” for abortions because her mother couldn’t have one.


4 posted on 03/20/2017 2:26:35 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (I tried being reasonable, I didn't like it. - Clint Eastwood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
“He Believes the Intentional Taking of Human Life is Always Wrong”

Yeah, it's called murder, ya' dumb a$$!

5 posted on 03/20/2017 2:27:05 PM PDT by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

One of the smartest things I did at 18 years of age, was put as much distance between myself and the Democrats as I could by registering as a Republican.

How anyone but a mentally challenged person could stand to be registered as a Democrat or support one, is unfathomable to me.


6 posted on 03/20/2017 2:30:14 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

DiFi, while not QUITE as sickening as Pelosi or Boxer, is running a close race now with them for the moral depravity prize of the year

alas
hope she finally retires soon


7 posted on 03/20/2017 2:33:42 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicans are not born, they're excreted." -- Marcus Tillius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

“He Believes the Intentional Taking of Human Life is Always Wrong”

What a horrible human being!


8 posted on 03/20/2017 2:35:34 PM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
she probably will oppose Gorsuch because he believes “the intentional taking of a human life by private persons is always wrong.”

She admits to what it is. I don't keep track of Feinstein's statements on abortion, but I would figure she would follow the usual line and say abortion is not taking a human life. But she admits to what it is. Stunning.

9 posted on 03/20/2017 2:36:03 PM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican (If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

California voters are weird...Pelosi and Feinstein??????????
and MOONBEAM??????? good grief...


10 posted on 03/20/2017 2:37:30 PM PDT by terycarl (COMMON SENSE PREVAILS OVERALL!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Feinstein you jerk, STFU with pandering to your amoral, hedonist, base.

Abortion is the taking of an innocent human life, not the State taking the life of a convicted criminal, usually a criminal animal in cases where the death penalty is actually applied.

I'm so damn tired of the fascist democrat double standards when it comes to courts, judges, and the application of the law. They don't even apply logic or reason, just their BS emotional arguments, irrational statements of their fantasies as if they're fact, and bare faced lies as if they're truth.

11 posted on 03/20/2017 2:38:06 PM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Betcha Diane would have a different view of taking innocent life if her's was the one that was in peril.

But then the anti gun hypocrite did buy a gun for protection when she felt her life was in danger.

12 posted on 03/20/2017 2:38:57 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

If I recall didn’t DiFi intentionally leak Intel in retribution in protest, which was harmful to both national security & OPSEC?


13 posted on 03/20/2017 2:39:19 PM PDT by Clutch Martin (Hot sauce aside, every culture has its pancake, just as every culture has its noodle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NYer
SIGN THE PETITION! Vote to Confirm Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch...Gorsuch is in - I'm saving my efforts for the next conservative nominee, who can change the direction of the court for a decade and whom the 'rats will stop at nothing to not just block but to destroy.....
14 posted on 03/20/2017 2:39:49 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Personal details
Born Dianne Emiel Goldman
June 22, 1933 (age 83)
San Francisco, California, U.S.
Political party Democratic
Spouse(s) Jack Berman (1956–1959)
Bertram Feinstein (1962–1978)
Richard Blum (1980–present)
Children 1 daughter


15 posted on 03/20/2017 2:41:07 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Demonicrat Dianne Feinstein is a lying murdering traitor who should be indicted, tried, convicted, sentenced and then publicly hanged for genocidal murder, crimes against humanity, and giving aid and comfort to the enemy.


16 posted on 03/20/2017 2:43:07 PM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Feinstein drew on the issue of abortion for her criticism — saying that she probably will oppose Gorsuch because he believes “the intentional taking of a human life by private persons is always wrong.” At the very beginning of her moronic statement, she tacitly admitted abortion is MURDER - what else would she call the “the intentional taking of a human life by private persons..."
17 posted on 03/20/2017 2:45:15 PM PDT by heterosupremacist (Domine Iesu Christe, Filius Dei, miserere me peccatorem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Someone needs to ask Dianne, “when is the intentional taking of human life RIGHT?”.


18 posted on 03/20/2017 2:46:50 PM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Yes. Murder is always wrong.


19 posted on 03/20/2017 2:47:31 PM PDT by Old Yeller (Auto-correct has become my worst enema.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

She could always go retroactive and go dive off the nearest overpass. Make me AND her mom happy....


20 posted on 03/20/2017 2:47:56 PM PDT by Quickgun (I got here kicking,screaming and covered in someone else's blood. I can go out that way if I have to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer

And Swinestein is ALWAYS wrong, no matter the issue. She falls right between Maxine Waters and Sheila Jackson Lee in beauty and intelligence in my opinion..


21 posted on 03/20/2017 2:51:03 PM PDT by Quickgun (I got here kicking,screaming and covered in someone else's blood. I can go out that way if I have to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
‘the intentional taking of a human life by private persons is always wrong.’

No chit


22 posted on 03/20/2017 2:52:43 PM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

And so, the old argument continues...the argument between moral truth and moral relativism, between ethical surety and the mushy situational ethics of the left.

And, yet we don’t recognize liberalism for the mental disorder it actually is.


23 posted on 03/20/2017 3:04:14 PM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2017; I pray we make it that long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Just my response to the Headline ...

Well Duh


24 posted on 03/20/2017 3:12:12 PM PDT by TexasTransplant (They used to get away with it. Not anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

*** “I’ll bet Feinstein is one of those dizzy broads who is “fighting” for abortions because her mother couldn’t have one.” ***

I do believe that she is that dumb/stupid, can’t assign it to anything else.


25 posted on 03/20/2017 3:15:18 PM PDT by TexasTransplant (They used to get away with it. Not anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer

So according to Senator Douchebag, it should be LEGAL to take human life? I tell ya with liberals there is absolutely NO cure for stupid..its embedded in them, forever


26 posted on 03/20/2017 3:19:04 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laweeks

Sounds like she is admitting that a fetus IS a human life..she just doesn’t care if that baby gets slaughtered in the womb


27 posted on 03/20/2017 3:19:54 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PubliusMM
# 23 PubliusMM, "And so, the old argument continues...the argument between moral truth and moral relativism, between ethical surety and the mushy situational ethics of the left..." You make an excellent point. There has never been a subjective truth. Truth MUST be objective; as per its definition, ~ there can only be One TRUTH! Et Via, Et Veritas, Et Vida! †
28 posted on 03/20/2017 3:21:45 PM PDT by heterosupremacist (Domine Iesu Christe, Filius Dei, miserere me peccatorem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I don’t think she meant to say it,but she flat out ADMITTED that the “little clump of cells” is indeed a human being! OMG!


29 posted on 03/20/2017 3:23:29 PM PDT by Maskot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

I must disagree. There is certainly a difference between unintentionally hitting somebody dressed in black with your car at night and pulling your gun and dispatching a burglar who’s reaching for his.

I say the morality is clear and that we can’t split hairs on “the meaning of intentional” and divine a conclusion of whether Gorsuch would be a hard-liner on self-defense.


30 posted on 03/20/2017 3:30:37 PM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NYer

DiFi loves abortion. She wallows in its gore.


31 posted on 03/20/2017 3:48:32 PM PDT by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Between life in prison and death I would choose death.

Life is a way way worse punishment then death.


32 posted on 03/20/2017 3:54:46 PM PDT by FreedomStar3028 (Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Between life in prison and death I would choose death.

Life is a way way worse punishment then death.


33 posted on 03/20/2017 3:55:09 PM PDT by FreedomStar3028 (Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I look forward to the day when Feinstein burns in hell like she deserves. She’s got a lot to answer for and who she has to answer to won’t give a damn that she was a US Senator.


34 posted on 03/20/2017 3:55:28 PM PDT by MeganC (Democrat by birth, Republican by default, conservative by principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The left just loves their abortion. Nothing more addictive than power and what can be more powerful than the intentional killing of the most innocent among us?


35 posted on 03/20/2017 3:58:15 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Flinging poo is not a valid argument)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

You know, I’m starting to come around on this abortion thing. I really wish that Merkle and Feinstein’s mothers had gone the abortion route! How dare they not exercise their rights as women!!


36 posted on 03/20/2017 3:58:16 PM PDT by Batman11 ( The USA is not an ATM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

**pro-abortion Democrat Dianne Feinstein slammed the potential High Court pick.**

I guess Feinstein has forgotten the Commandments given by God.

“Thou shalt not kill.”

Abortion is killing — always the baby and sometimes the mother, too.


37 posted on 03/20/2017 3:58:43 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

“He Believes the Intentional Taking of Human Life is Always Wrong”

________________________________________________________

And Feinstein and the rest of the democrats don’t understand why their party is the smallest its been since the 1920’s.

Feinstain is a NASTY, MURDEROUS person.


38 posted on 03/20/2017 4:04:01 PM PDT by TMA62 (Al Sharpton - The North Korea of race relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NYer

All the Dems approved Gorsuch for Appeals Court. The GOP should take a page out of the Dems playbook and claim that as they had previously aproved him then the Senate should deem his appointment confirmed. Next...


39 posted on 03/20/2017 4:19:53 PM PDT by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
Other than judicial execution, when is the intentional taking of a human life acceptable?

War. Even in provoked war, your side will wind up killing people on the other side who are otherwise innocent, because it's necessary to win.

40 posted on 03/20/2017 4:24:57 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I am hopeful that Gorsuch is everything we conservatives and constitutionalists want him to be, but when I read the except below, I am a little bit concerned:

“...In constitutional litigation, too, experiments and pilot programs–real-world laboratories in which ideas can be assessed on the results they produce–are not possible.”

As a Christian, I am not a fan of judging right/wrong by outcomes. The meaning of the 2A does not depend on crime statistics. The desirability of limited government does not depend on whether widespread health insurance is achieved. We should leave the outcome based approach in ethics to the secular humanists (ie. the modern liberals aka socialists).

Maybe I’m just missing the point? Either way, I am looking forward to hearing how Gorsuch responds to conservatives. Here’s hoping that he gets some really good original-intent questions to test his bona fides.


41 posted on 03/20/2017 5:12:44 PM PDT by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

“Feinstein drew on the issue of abortion for her criticism — saying that she probably will oppose Gorsuch because he believes “the intentional taking of a human life by private persons is always wrong.””

Wow. She believes you should never kill anyone who doesn’t need it, then?


42 posted on 03/20/2017 5:19:14 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (“If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
WELCOME TO STUPID
A wholly-owned subsidiary of the Democrat National Committee.
43 posted on 03/20/2017 5:20:14 PM PDT by HKMk23 (You ask how to fight an idea? Well, I'll tell you how: with another idea!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

In an ideal world, Feinstein’s comments would probably disqualify her from holding elected office, not because she is a D, but because respect for the right to life, liberty, property are fundamental concepts in a republican form of government.


44 posted on 03/20/2017 5:21:50 PM PDT by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

45 posted on 03/20/2017 6:55:16 PM PDT by Chode (My job is not to represent the world. My job is to represent the United States of America-#45 DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317

I am becoming very skeptical of Gore Suck. We take these criminal bastard lives every day. AND WE WILL CONTINUE to do so on these rapists and cop killers and murdered of the innocent. What we care about is innocent babies being slaughtered by the millions. Criminals are not human. Watch this guy— he may be a turn coat.


46 posted on 03/20/2017 7:23:21 PM PDT by WENDLE (DEFEAT RINOCARI . NO RINOCARE!! TRUMP WAKE UP!! Fire SESSIONS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WENDLE

Your beerface is showing. He will be confirmed.


47 posted on 03/20/2017 7:25:47 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

Watch that bastard. “Human life” is criminal life. The phrase is INNOCENT HUMAN LIFE!! Is he against capital punishment? Screw that!! ( I hate beer— never touch it!)


48 posted on 03/20/2017 7:28:32 PM PDT by WENDLE (DEFEAT RINOCARI . NO RINOCARE!! TRUMP WAKE UP!! Fire SESSIONS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: WENDLE

You can scream all you want. Choose the battles wisely.

When Kennedy quits your gonna see liberal heads explode.

This one is a given.


49 posted on 03/20/2017 7:31:30 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

I’ll take him but I am not confident who he is with that BS!! Can you say SOUTER?


50 posted on 03/20/2017 7:33:10 PM PDT by WENDLE (DEFEAT RINOCARI . NO RINOCARE!! TRUMP WAKE UP!! Fire SESSIONS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson