STELTER: Let me ask you about this thing.
JOHNSON: Sure.
STELTER: So my sense is that on Monday, Napolitano says this on TV, he says he has Intel sources who believe this is true. Youre saying you were one of those sources, but you didnt know Napolitano was going to use you like that?
JOHNSON: What happened was I communicated, when Donald Trump tweeted what he did Saturday two weeks ago, the next day I was interviewed on Russia today. I had known about the fact that the British, through ghcq were information back channel, this was not at the behest of Barack Obama, lets be clear about that. But it was done with the full knowledge of people like John Brennan and Jake clapper. Two people I flow within the intelligence community in January, they were very concerned about this because they saw it as an unfair meddling in the politics, but it was a way to get around the issue of American intelligence agencies not collecting.
STELTER: To be clear, you have this secondhand? So you didnt get this information directly, youre hearing from others.
JOHNSON: Im hearing it from people who are in a position to know, thats correct.
Not conclusive but pretty interesting...
>> this was not at the behest of Barack Obama <<
Utter BS.
Nothing happened in the Obama government that he didn’t know about and espionage was his favorite specialty.
pgkdan wrote:
“Here is the rush transcript:
STELTER: Let me ask you about this thing.
JOHNSON: Sure.
STELTER: So my sense is that on Monday, Napolitano says this on TV, he says he has Intel sources who believe this is true. Youre saying you were one of those sources, but you didnt know Napolitano was going to use you like that?
JOHNSON: What happened was I communicated, when Donald Trump tweeted what he did Saturday two weeks ago, the next day I was interviewed on Russia today. I had known about the fact that the British, through ghcq were information back channel, this was not at the behest of Barack Obama, lets be clear about that. But it was done with the full knowledge of people like John Brennan and Jake clapper. Two people I flow within the intelligence community in January, they were very concerned about this because they saw it as an unfair meddling in the politics, but it was a way to get around the issue of American intelligence agencies not collecting.
STELTER: To be clear, you have this secondhand? So you didnt get this information directly, youre hearing from others.
JOHNSON: Im hearing it from people who are in a position to know, thats correct.
Not conclusive but pretty interesting...”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3536327/posts?page=3#3
Thanks for the info!
Ping to CNN admitting it was GCHQ that surveilled President Trump!
“they were very concerned about this because they saw it as an unfair meddling in the politics”
Total word games. The phrases “very concerned” and “saw it as an unfair meddling” are meaningless and inconclusive. The statement doesn’t contradict the possibility of their full and complete approval and participation.
Get a load of this.
More conclusive than anything showing Trump Colluding with Russia.