Was the character assassination of Judge Bork the Left's last stand against SCOTUS nominees?
To: Academiadotorg
Was the character assassination of Judge Bork the Left’s last stand against SCOTUS nominees?
Possibly. Ever since his name became a verb, it’s been difficult for them.
2 posted on
03/15/2017 6:57:43 AM PDT by
Mr. Douglas
(Best. Election. EVER!)
To: Academiadotorg
It is a wonderful thing to see the left walk away from a group mental masturbation session without a “happy ending”.
Judge Bork.
Maybe we can collect some of the interest on that bill.
3 posted on
03/15/2017 7:11:48 AM PDT by
oldvirginian
(This Space For Rent)
To: Academiadotorg
That doesn’t keep them from trying again and again........................
4 posted on
03/15/2017 7:13:07 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
To: Academiadotorg
The Clarence Thomas hearings were the turning point, IMO.
Since the pubic hair on coke can testimony, it's been all down "Hill".
5 posted on
03/15/2017 7:23:41 AM PDT by
Bratch
("The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke)
To: Academiadotorg
Nope - they were successful in their atrocity - they fully expect such tactics to still be viable.
8 posted on
03/15/2017 8:39:41 AM PDT by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
To: Academiadotorg
The lefties are in a crunch. They want to come out shooting with all guns blazing on this nominee but are refraining from doing so, because they know the biggest one will actually be the following nominee.
Somehow they need to be encouraged to shoot their entire wad on this nominee. If they do that, the next one may be a cake walk for our side.
9 posted on
03/15/2017 9:17:58 AM PDT by
Slyfox
(Where's Reagan when we need him? Look in the mirror - the spirit of The Gipper lives within you.)
To: Academiadotorg
Congressional Review Act (CRA), whereby Congress can overturn recent regulations that cost $100 million, is an attack on civil rightsYou know, there's a way this can be resolved, where the regulation COULD remain, for instance, with EPA regulations that have destroyed the ability of land owners to use their land. How about if Congress were to amend the law, stating that IF third parties wish for these regulations to stay in effect, all they need to do is pay the financial damages to the land owners, which technically the government that restricted the use, should have done in the first place.
If the land owner is "made whole" by these 3rd parties, then the regulation would be allowed to stand. I wonder how much the Sierra Club is willing to pay for the snail darter?
The best part of that law is that it's congress taking some of their power back (which they never should have ceded in the first place) from the bureaucrats!
Mark
10 posted on
03/15/2017 11:19:43 AM PDT by
MarkL
(Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson